John M. Van Buren
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Surgery top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Alfred S. KetchamRosemary C. BorkePaul FedioRobert R. SmithRobert H. WilkinsAllan F. MirskyG. A. OjemannJames H. Wood
- Topics
- Neurological disorders and treatments (16 papers)Epilepsy research and treatment (15 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
John M. Van Buren
79 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
- Surgery 892
- Psychiatry and Mental health 729
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 713
- Neurology 679
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Van Buren
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Van Buren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Van Buren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Van Buren more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Van Buren
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Van Buren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Van Buren. The network helps show where John M. Van Buren may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Van Buren
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Van Buren. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Van Buren based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Van Buren. John M. Van Buren is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 119 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | The nuclei and cerebral connections of the human thalamus | 19 |
| 11 | Variations of the human diencephalon | 8 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 190 | |
| 15 | 52 | |
| 16 | 67 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About John M. Van Buren
John M. Van Buren is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 79 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurological disorders and treatments (16 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (15 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (729 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (206 citations). John M. Van Buren has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Alfred S. Ketcham, Rosemary C. Borke, Paul Fedio, Robert R. Smith, Robert H. Wilkins, Allan F. Mirsky, G. A. Ojemann, James H. Wood, C. Ajmone-Marsan and Robert C. Hoye. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Brain and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.