John M. Jones
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies
- Communication top 10%
- Media Studies and Communication
Papers in
- Philosophy 12
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies 11
- History 10
- Historical Studies of British Isles 6
- Scottish History and National Identity 6
- Co-authors
- Robert C. Rowland (11 shared papers)Sanchari Das (2 shared papers)Peter Mayer (2 shared papers)Melanie Volkamer (2 shared papers)David Jones (1 shared paper)Felix J. Rogers (1 shared paper)Michael A. Seffinger (1 shared paper)Hollis H. King (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Rhetoric and Public Affairs (6 papers)Presidential Studies Quarterly (2 papers)World Literature Today (10 papers)The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association (1 paper)Communication Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
John M. Jones
21 papers receiving 142 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Philosophy 82
- Communication 49
- Classics 20
- Literature and Literary Theory 49
- History 41
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Jones. The network helps show where John M. Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside John M. Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 63 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1978 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1981 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 5 | |
| 13 | Philosophy of osteopathic medicine | 2018 | 5 |
| 14 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 1 |
About John M. Jones
John M. Jones is a scholar working on Philosophy, History, Communication, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (11 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (6 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (6 papers), Media Studies and Communication (4 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (3 papers), Academic Freedom and Politics (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (82 citations), Communication (49 citations), Classics (20 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (49 citations) and History (41 citations). John M. Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Robert C. Rowland, Sanchari Das, Peter Mayer, Melanie Volkamer, David Jones, Felix J. Rogers, Michael A. Seffinger, Hollis H. King, John Harris and John C. Licciardone. Their work appears in journals such as Rhetoric and Public Affairs, Presidential Studies Quarterly, World Literature Today, The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association and Communication Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.