John Laver

4.5k citations
60 papers · 2.3k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 19

John Laver

51 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

The phonetic description of voice quality7061980202619952010200400600

Peers

John Laver
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Linguistics and Language 474
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
  • Language and Linguistics 395
  • Signal Processing 289
  • Artificial Intelligence 724
Replace Peter Roach with:
Peter Roach United Kingdom
Sarah Hawkins United Kingdom
Janet Fletcher Australia
Sven Öhman Sweden
Louis-Jean Boë France
Kenneth C. Hill United States
Ian Maddieson United States
Keith R. Kluender United States
John J. Ohala United States
Jonathan Harrington Germany
John Laver relative to Peter Roach United Kingdom Peter Roach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Peter Roach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Laver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Laver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Laver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Laver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Laver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Laver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Laver. The network helps show where John Laver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Laver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Laver Line = papers co-authored together John Laver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202034
2 201741
3 201615
4 201696
5 201559
6 201485
7 201368
8 201214
9
The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd Edition
201018
10 20011
11 19941
12 19926
13 199256
14 19881
15 19882
16 19872
17 198618
18 19793
19 19684
20 196511

About John Laver

John Laver is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Aging, Linguistics and Language, Signal Processing and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (17 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (11 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (7 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (6 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (6 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (6 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (5 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (474 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.2k citations), Language and Linguistics (395 citations), Signal Processing (289 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (724 citations). John Laver has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Donald S. Boomer, Craig A. Smibert, Howard D. Lipshitz, Steven Hiller, J. Timothy Westwood, Quaid Morris, Janet Mackenzie Beck, Xiao Li, Sachdev S. Sidhu and Mervyn Jack. Their work appears in journals such as Speech Communication, Journal of the International Phonetic Association, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Genome biology and Journal of Voice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026