Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Image super-resolution as sparse representation of raw image patches
Countries citing papers authored by John L. Wright
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John L. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John L. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John L. Wright more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John L. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John L. Wright. The network helps show where John L. Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John L. Wright
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John L. Wright.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John L. Wright based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John L. Wright. John L. Wright is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wright, John L., et al.. (2015). Forced Convection From a Pair Of Spheres: A Three-Temperature Problem. UWSpace (University of Waterloo).1 indexed citations
Wright, John L., et al.. (2009). Determining Off-Normal Solar Optical Properties of Roller Blinds. UWSpace (University of Waterloo).30 indexed citations
7.
Wright, John L., et al.. (2006). Solar Absorption by Each Element in a Glazing/Shading Layer Array. UWSpace (University of Waterloo). 3–12.24 indexed citations
8.
Collins, Michael R. & John L. Wright. (2006). Calculating center-glass performance indices of windows with a diathermanous layer. UWSpace (University of Waterloo). 22–29.12 indexed citations
9.
Wright, John L., et al.. (2006). Thermal resistance of a window with an enclosed venetian blind : Guarded heater plate measurements. UWSpace (University of Waterloo). 13–21.17 indexed citations
Wright, John L., et al.. (2004). Heat Transfer Analysis of a Between-Panes Venetian Blind Using Effective Longwave Radiative Properties. UWSpace (University of Waterloo).13 indexed citations
Wright, John L., et al.. (1998). Computer Simulation of Window Condensation Potential. UWSpace (University of Waterloo).1 indexed citations
14.
Wright, John L.. (1996). A Correlation to Quantify Convective Heat Transfer Between Vertical Window Glazings. UWSpace (University of Waterloo).68 indexed citations
Wright, John L. & H.F. Sullivan. (1989). Natural Convection in Sealed Glazing Units: A Review. UWSpace (University of Waterloo).13 indexed citations
17.
Wright, John L. & H.F. Sullivan. (1988). Glazing System U-Value Measurement Using a Guarded Heater Plate Apparatus. UWSpace (University of Waterloo).9 indexed citations
18.
Budd, Richard W., Brent D. Ruben, Robert F. Rich, et al.. (1979). General Mass Communication. Communication Booknotes. 10(8). 147–151.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.