John L. Williams

6.9k total citations
165 papers, 5.2k citations indexed

About

John L. Williams is a scholar working on Surgery, Polymers and Plastics and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, John L. Williams has authored 165 papers receiving a total of 5.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Surgery, 36 papers in Polymers and Plastics and 30 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in John L. Williams's work include Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (18 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (15 papers) and Bone health and osteoporosis research (15 papers). John L. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (18 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (15 papers) and Bone health and osteoporosis research (15 papers). John L. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. John L. Williams's co-authors include V. Stannett, J. L. Lewis, Cynthia S. Petrie, Paulette Spencer, A O'Mahony, Félix W. Wehrli, Andrew R. Karduna, Gerald R. Williams, A. Peterlin and H. B. Hopfenberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Statistical Association and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

John L. Williams

164 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers

John L. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Surgery 1.6k
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.3k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 958
  • Oral Surgery 651
  • Polymers and Plastics 642
Replace J. Lawrence Katz with:
J. Lawrence Katz United States
Angela Lin United States
R.K. Nalla United States
Richard Weinkamer Germany
J.H. Kinney United States
Ara Nazarian United States
David Taylor Ireland
Yi‐Xian Qin United States
Peter Zioupos United Kingdom
Ozan Akkuş United States
J. Lawrence Katz United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to John L. Williams
John L. Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to John L. Williams
John L. Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by John L. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John L. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John L. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John L. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John L. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John L. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John L. Williams. The network helps show where John L. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John L. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John L. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John L. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John L. Williams. John L. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 6
3 29
4 8
5 71
6 9
7 61
8 4
9 18
10 4
11 2
12 66
13 41
14 19
15 66
16 154
17 97
18 36
19 82
20 1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026