John L. Miles

458 citations
10 papers · 367 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

John L. Miles

9 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

John L. Miles
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Condensed Matter Physics 163
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 197
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 71
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 160
  • Materials Chemistry 103
Replace A. J. Kurtzig with:
A. J. Kurtzig Japan
E. Sawatzky United States
M. Boulou France
S. P. Herko United States
Masakazu Fukai Japan
K. Khachaturyan United States
R. B. Zetterstrom United States
M. Razeghi United States
M. J. Peanasky United States
P. P. Debye United States
John L. Miles relative to A. J. Kurtzig Japan A. J. Kurtzig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
A. J. Kurtzig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John L. Miles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John L. Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John L. Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John L. Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John L. Miles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John L. Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John L. Miles. The network helps show where John L. Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside John L. Miles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John L. Miles Line = papers co-authored together John L. Miles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown

About John L. Miles

John L. Miles is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 10 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (3 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (2 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (1 paper), Nuclear materials and radiation effects (1 paper), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (1 paper), Advanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines (1 paper) and Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (163 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (197 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (71 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (160 citations) and Materials Chemistry (103 citations). John L. Miles has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Patricia H. Smith, Paul H. Smith, H. O. McMahon, H. F. Kay, Sidney Shapiro, P. F. Strong, S. M. Shapiro, M. Cohen and Robert J. Murphy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, IBM Journal of Research and Development, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Proceedings of the IEEE and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact