John L. Hogg
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 10%
- Pharmaceutical Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Richard L. SchowenKunisi S. VenkatasubbanKenneth R. DavisDaniel M. QuinnIldiko M. KovachW. Phillip HuskeyJames D. RodgersWilliam P. Jencks
- Topics
- Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (15 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (8 papers)Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyThe Journal of Organic ChemistryJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Partner nations
- United StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
John L. Hogg
37 papers receiving 433 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Organic Chemistry 255
- Molecular Biology 195
- Spectroscopy 90
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 49
- Pharmaceutical Science 46
Countries citing papers authored by John L. Hogg
This map shows the geographic impact of John L. Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John L. Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John L. Hogg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John L. Hogg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John L. Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John L. Hogg. The network helps show where John L. Hogg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John L. Hogg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John L. Hogg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John L. Hogg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John L. Hogg. John L. Hogg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | エステルおよびアミドの,分子間イミダゾール触媒加水分解における,一プロトン触媒 | 5 |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About John L. Hogg
John L. Hogg is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Spectroscopy and Organic Chemistry, having authored 40 papers that have together received 476 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (15 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (8 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (255 citations), Filtration and Separation (17 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (46 citations). John L. Hogg has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Richard L. Schowen, Kunisi S. Venkatasubban, Kenneth R. Davis, Daniel M. Quinn, Ildiko M. Kovach, W. Phillip Huskey, James D. Rodgers, William P. Jencks, A. Ian Scott and Neal J. Stolowich. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.