John Kent

37 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers

John Kent
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Computational Mechanics 205
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 164
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 76
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 63
  • Aerospace Engineering 40
Replace Anke Buschmann with:
Anke Buschmann Germany
Y. Konno Japan
Meurig T. Gallagher United Kingdom
Daniel Teixeira Maldonado Brazil
W. Murgatroyd United Kingdom
Emily A. Marshall United Kingdom
Robert James Mackinnon United States
James R. Hansen United States
Abdul Basit Pakistan
Emmanuel Laroche France
John Kent relative to Anke Buschmann Germany Anke Buschmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
Anke Buschmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Kent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Kent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Kent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Kent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Kent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Kent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Kent. The network helps show where John Kent may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Kent

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Kent. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Kent based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Kent. John Kent is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 17
2 28
3
Commons Education Select Committee: The impact of COVID-19 on education and children’s services
1
4
Descolonização e Guerra Fria: a ONU, os Estados Unidos e a crise do Congo (1960-1963)
0
5 21
6
Wrinkling Scales of Turbulent Premixed Propagating Flame Fronts Obtained From LIF-OH Imaging
1
7
A numerical method for conditional moment closure
3
8 7
9 3
10 2
11 17
12
"Concordia" solidi of Theodosius I: a reappraisal
3
13 7
14 13
15 39
16 16
17 4
18 6
19
Jabez Bunting : the last Wesleyan : a study in the Methodist ministry after the death of John Wesley
0
20 2

About John Kent

John Kent is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, History and Classics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (7 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (6 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (164 citations), Computational Mechanics (205 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (76 citations). John Kent has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matthew J. Cleary, R.W. Bilger, Andreas Kronenburg, M. Ryle, Jim Rogerson, J. Dullaart, N. Swaminathan, Konstantina Vogiatzaki, Ian M. Kennedy and Vasily B. Novozhilov. Their work appears in journals such as Combustion and Flame, Energy & Fuels and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026