John K. Kellerman

17 papers receiving 401 citations

Hit Papers

Annual Research Review: A meta‐analytic review of worldwi...2019202620212023201950100150200

Peers

John K. Kellerman
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Clinical Psychology 324
  • Social Psychology 141
  • Sociology and Political Science 56
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 47
  • General Health Professions 40
Replace Xuji Jia with:
Xuji Jia China
Tamar Kodish United States
Kathryn M. Roeder United States
Erin F. Ward‐Ciesielski United States
Danielle R. Busby United States
Greg E. Dear Australia
Juventino Hernández Rodríguez United States
Jack De Stefano Canada
Andréa R. Kaniuka United States
Alexis E. Arbuthnott Canada
John K. Kellerman relative to Xuji Jia China Xuji Jia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Xuji Jia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John K. Kellerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John K. Kellerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John K. Kellerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John K. Kellerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John K. Kellerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John K. Kellerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John K. Kellerman. The network helps show where John K. Kellerman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John K. Kellerman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John K. Kellerman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John K. Kellerman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John K. Kellerman. John K. Kellerman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 1
4 5
5 1
6 1
7 1
8 11
9 26
10 6
11
A Descriptive Case Study of a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Group Intervention Adaptation for Transgender Youth With Social Anxiety Disorder.
1
12 12
13 35
14 23
15 52
16 14
17
Annual Research Review: A meta‐analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescentsbreakdown →
216
18
Perceived Social Support and Suicide-related Depression Symptom Clusters among Queer College Students
1

About John K. Kellerman

John K. Kellerman is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (10 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (324 citations), Social Psychology (141 citations) and Applied Psychology (31 citations). John K. Kellerman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Evan M. Kleiman, Erika C. Esposito, Andrew C. Porter, Catherine R. Glenn, B. Christine, Peter A. Wyman, Olivia H. Pollak, Edward A. Selby, Joanne S. Kim and Cindy J. Chang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Behaviour Research and Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026