Greg E. Dear

933 total citations
37 papers, 606 citations indexed

About

Greg E. Dear is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Greg E. Dear has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 606 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Clinical Psychology, 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Greg E. Dear's work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (10 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers). Greg E. Dear is often cited by papers focused on Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (10 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers). Greg E. Dear collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and United States. Greg E. Dear's co-authors include Donald M. Thomson, Clare Roberts, Adelma M. Hills, Patrick Frottier, Alison Liebling, Marco Sarchiapone, Lindsay M. Hayes, Norbert Konrad, Marc Daigle and Anasseril E. Daniel and has published in prestigious journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Psychiatry Research and Sex Roles.

In The Last Decade

Greg E. Dear

36 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Greg E. Dear Australia 14 469 257 138 79 78 37 606
Renee Schneider United States 11 440 0.9× 152 0.6× 116 0.8× 62 0.8× 94 1.2× 18 578
Gila Chen Israel 13 241 0.5× 168 0.7× 84 0.6× 130 1.6× 67 0.9× 42 464
Arno Herberth Austria 7 450 1.0× 128 0.5× 223 1.6× 46 0.6× 99 1.3× 10 569
Victoria M. O’Keefe United States 13 395 0.8× 214 0.8× 241 1.7× 26 0.3× 96 1.2× 16 610
Kristine Burkman United States 11 706 1.5× 179 0.7× 122 0.9× 53 0.7× 62 0.8× 15 865
Luis M. Añez United States 12 401 0.9× 124 0.5× 144 1.0× 89 1.1× 31 0.4× 24 581
Danielle R. Busby United States 14 496 1.1× 163 0.6× 264 1.9× 22 0.3× 67 0.9× 24 665
Ashley B. Cole United States 14 367 0.8× 197 0.8× 123 0.9× 19 0.2× 64 0.8× 32 540
Christine Friestad Norway 15 375 0.8× 260 1.0× 63 0.5× 40 0.5× 134 1.7× 51 593
Angela S. Richardson Australia 8 491 1.0× 108 0.4× 89 0.6× 24 0.3× 102 1.3× 10 580

Countries citing papers authored by Greg E. Dear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Greg E. Dear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg E. Dear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg E. Dear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Greg E. Dear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg E. Dear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg E. Dear. The network helps show where Greg E. Dear may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Greg E. Dear

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Greg E. Dear. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Greg E. Dear based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Greg E. Dear. Greg E. Dear is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bright, Stephen, et al.. (2022). Response to ‘Drug checking services increase the intention to use drugs in some (small) subgroups of music festival attendees’. Drug and Alcohol Review. 41(5). 1256–1257. 1 indexed citations
2.
Bright, Stephen, et al.. (2021). Could a drug‐checking service increase intention to use ecstasy at a festival?. Drug and Alcohol Review. 40(6). 974–978. 11 indexed citations
3.
4.
Dear, Greg E., et al.. (2020). Four Case Studies Examining Male Victims of Intimate Partner Abuse. Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma. 30(1). 3–24. 4 indexed citations
5.
Dear, Greg E., et al.. (2019). Psychological reports for sentencing juveniles in Australian courts. Psychiatry Psychology and Law. 26(3). 355–374. 3 indexed citations
6.
Ohan, Jeneva L., et al.. (2014). The stigmatisation of the provision of services for alcohol and other drug users: A systematic literature review. Drugs Education Prevention and Policy. 22(1). 19–25. 8 indexed citations
7.
Dear, Greg E., et al.. (2013). Reliability of clinical judgements of insight in patients with psychoses. Psychiatry Research. 208(3). 291–292. 1 indexed citations
8.
Dear, Greg E., et al.. (2009). Faking Good on the MCMI–III: Implications for Child Custody Evaluations. Journal of Personality Assessment. 91(6). 553–559. 13 indexed citations
9.
Allan, Alfred, et al.. (2007). INTIMATE PARTNER ABUSE OF MEN. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 22 indexed citations
10.
Dear, Greg E. & Clare Roberts. (2005). Validation of the Holyoake Codependency Index. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 139(4). 293–314. 22 indexed citations
11.
Dear, Greg E. & Clare Roberts. (2002). The Relationships Between Codependency and Femininity and Masculinity. Sex Roles. 46(5-6). 159–165. 20 indexed citations
12.
Dear, Greg E.. (2002). PERCEPTIONS OF ANOTHER PERSON'S HEAVY DRINKING AS A FUNCTION OF ONE'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE DRINKER: A PILOT STUDY. Psychological Reports. 90(2). 426–426. 1 indexed citations
13.
Dear, Greg E.. (2002). The Holyoake Codependency Index: further evidence of factorial validity. Drug and Alcohol Review. 21(1). 47–52. 12 indexed citations
14.
Dear, Greg E., et al.. (2001). Evaluations of the Quality of Coping Reported by Prisoners Who Have Self‐Harmed and Those Who Have Not. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 31(4). 442–450. 22 indexed citations
15.
Dear, Greg E., Donald M. Thomson, Kevin Howells, & Guy Hall. (2001). Self-Harm in Western Australian Prisons: Differences Between Prisoners Who Have Self-Harmed and Those Who Have Not. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 34(3). 277–292. 30 indexed citations
16.
Dear, Greg E.. (2000). Functional and Dysfunctional Impulsivity, Depression, and Suicidal Ideation in a Prison Population. The Journal of Psychology. 134(1). 77–80. 16 indexed citations
17.
Dear, Greg E. & Clare Roberts. (2000). The Holyoake Codependency Index: Investigation of the Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties. Psychological Reports. 87(3). 991–1002. 12 indexed citations
18.
Dear, Greg E., et al.. (2000). Prisoners’ Perceptions of Prison Officers as Sources of Support. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 31(1-2). 127–142. 30 indexed citations
19.
Dear, Greg E.. (2000). THE HOLYOAKE CODEPENDENCY INDEX: INVESTIGATION OF THE FACTOR STRUCTURE AND PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES. Psychological Reports. 87(7). 991–991. 7 indexed citations
20.
Dear, Greg E., et al.. (1994). Co‐dependency: a critical review. Drug and Alcohol Review. 13(4). 437–445. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Renee Schneider Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gila Chen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Arno Herberth Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Victoria M. O’Keefe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kristine Burkman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luis M. Añez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Danielle R. Busby Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ashley B. Cole Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christine Friestad Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Angela S. Richardson
Rankless by CCL
2026