John K. Fraser
Impact in
Papers in
- Genetics 25
- Mesenchymal stem cell research 24
- Hematology 17
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 8
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research 4
- Co-authors
- Marc H. HedrickMin ZhuPatricia A. ZukPeter AshjianProsper BenhaimDaniel A. De UgarteHiroshi MizunoJerry I. Huang
- Journals
- Molecular and Cellular Biology (6 papers)Cytotherapy (3 papers)Journal of Virology (3 papers)Transfusion (2 papers)Advances in Wound Care (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John K. Fraser
53 papers receiving 11.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Genetics 7.6k
- Urology 1.1k
- Biomaterials 2.1k
- Rehabilitation 993
- Surgery 4.9k
Countries citing papers authored by John K. Fraser
This map shows the geographic impact of John K. Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John K. Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John K. Fraser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John K. Fraser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John K. Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John K. Fraser. The network helps show where John K. Fraser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John K. Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 82 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 125 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 224 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 76 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 120 | |
| 11 | Fat tissue: an underappreciated source of stem cells for biotechnology Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 820 |
| 12 | 2005 | 113 | |
| 13 | Multipotential differentiation of adipose tissue-derived stem cells Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 739 |
| 14 | 2005 | 77 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 479 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 21 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 84 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 10 |
About John K. Fraser
John K. Fraser is a scholar working on Genetics, Hematology, Rehabilitation, Transplantation and Biomaterials, having authored 55 papers that have together received 11.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mesenchymal stem cell research (24 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (10 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (9 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (8 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (8 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (5 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (4 papers) and Body Contouring and Surgery (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (7.6k citations), Urology (1.1k citations), Biomaterials (2.1k citations), Rehabilitation (993 citations) and Surgery (4.9k citations). John K. Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marc H. Hedrick, Min Zhu, Patricia A. Zuk, Peter Ashjian, Prosper Benhaim, Daniel A. De Ugarte, Hiroshi Mizuno, Jerry I. Huang, Zeni Alfonso and Isabella H. Wulur. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular and Cellular Biology, Cytotherapy, Journal of Virology, Transfusion and Advances in Wound Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.