John J. Smith

89 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

John J. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Health Informatics 103
  • Urology 278
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 774
  • Internal Medicine 85
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 350
Replace Adelaide M. Arruda‐Olson with:
Adelaide M. Arruda‐Olson United States
Chi‐Ming Chu Taiwan
Joseph N. Liu United States
Khurshid A. Guru United States
Lilit Ayvazyan United Kingdom
Juan Gómez Rivas Spain
John H. Shin United States
John McGrath United Kingdom
Bhavan Prasad United Kingdom
Gregory D. Schroeder United States
John J. Smith relative to Adelaide M. Arruda‐Olson United States Adelaide M. Arruda‐Olson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Adelaide M. Arruda‐Olson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Smith. The network helps show where John J. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Smith Line = papers co-authored together John J. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998190
2 2020161
3 1998160
4 1998156
5 2003113
6 2004107
7 200078
8 199678
9 201371
10 200466
11 200256
12 200152
13 201947
14 201247
15 199845
16 201145
17 199442
18 201740
19 200434
20 200128

About John J. Smith

John J. Smith is a scholar working on Urology, Pharmacy, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (11 papers), Radiology practices and education (9 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (8 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (8 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (7 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (7 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (6 papers) and Urological Disorders and Treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (103 citations), Urology (278 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (774 citations), Internal Medicine (85 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (350 citations). John J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marvin A. Konstam, James E. Udelson, William Rand, Deeb N. Salem, Ayman S. Al-Khadra, James H. Thrall, A. Gregory Sorensen, Richard D. Patten, Joseph A. Pettus and Kyle A. Richards. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Roentgenology, The Journal of Urology, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Journal of the American College of Radiology and Journal of Endourology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026