Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Lightness and Retinex Theory
19712.8k citationsEdwin H. Land, John J. McCannprofile →
Citations per year, relative to John J. McCann John J. McCann (= 1×)
peers
David Field
Countries citing papers authored by John J. McCann
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John J. McCann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. McCann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. McCann more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. McCann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. McCann. The network helps show where John J. McCann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John J. McCann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John J. McCann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John J. McCann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John J. McCann. John J. McCann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McCann, John J.. (2012). The Interaction of Art, Technology and Customers in Picture Making. 3.
McCann, John J. & Alessandro Rizzi. (2003). The Spatial Proprties of Contrast.. 51–58.3 indexed citations
7.
McCann, John J. & Alessandro Rizzi. (2003). The Spatial Properties of Contrast. Color and Imaging Conference. 11(1). 51–58.8 indexed citations
8.
McCann, John J.. (2001). Gestalt Vision Experiments from an Image Processing Perspective. PICS. 9–14.3 indexed citations
9.
Funt, Brian, Florian Ciurea, & John J. McCann. (2000). Retinex in Matlab. Color and Imaging Conference. 8(1). 112–121.40 indexed citations
10.
Funt, Brian, Florian Ciurea, & John J. McCann. (2000). Retinex in Matlab.. 112–121.54 indexed citations
11.
McCann, John J.. (2000). Lessons Learned from Mondorians Applied to Real Images and Color Gamut(2.Keynote)(The Seventh Color Imaging Conference Report). 24(18). 20.
12.
McCann, John J.. (1999). Uniform Color Spaces: 3D LUTs vs. Algorithms.. PICS. 204–208.7 indexed citations
13.
McCann, John J. & Michael E. Stokes. (1998). Color Spaces and Image Quality.. PICS. 140–144.3 indexed citations
Sinclair, Robert, et al.. (1987). Marking of Lunar Major Standstill at the Three-Slab Site on Fajada Butte. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 19. 1043.4 indexed citations
17.
McCann, John J., et al.. (1979). Mechanism for the constant appearance of objects with varying viewing distance (A). Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 69. 1452.1 indexed citations
18.
McCann, John J., et al.. (1977). Visibility of low-spatial-frequency sine-wave surround (A). Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 67. 1408.3 indexed citations
19.
McCann, John J., et al.. (1977). Color Mondrian experiments: the study of average spectral distributions (A). Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 67. 1380.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.