John J. Chen

42 papers receiving 864 citations

Peers

John J. Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Occupational Therapy 38
  • Health 62
  • Ophthalmology 48
  • Epidemiology 179
  • General Health Professions 120
Replace J.-F. Boivin with:
J.-F. Boivin Canada
R. C. Palmer United States
Rob Riemsma United Kingdom
Michelle Lin United States
José Natal Figueirôa Brazil
Paul F. Hogan United States
Julian N. Robinson United States
Sumati Rao United States
Cornelia Junghans United Kingdom
Cynthia A. Lien United States
John J. Chen relative to J.-F. Boivin Canada J.-F. Boivin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J.-F. Boivin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Chen. The network helps show where John J. Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John J. Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Chen Line = papers co-authored together John J. Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008128
2
Racial/Ethnic-Specific Reference Intervals for Common Laboratory Tests: A Comparison among Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and White.
2015110
3 201090
4 201484
5 201647
6 201544
7 201729
8 201725
9 201623
10 201923
11 201823
12
A Survey of Physicians' Attitudes and Practices about the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine in Hawai'i.
201522
13 201321
14 201421
15 200919
16 202218
17 201417
18 201716
19 202116
20 201714

About John J. Chen

John J. Chen is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Physiology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 884 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (38 citations), Health (62 citations), Ophthalmology (48 citations), Epidemiology (179 citations) and General Health Professions (120 citations). John J. Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eunjung Lim, Jill Miyamura, James W. Davis, Guangxiang Zhang, Anthony M. Szema, Sarah M. Conron, Mark E. Thompson, Michael C. Peters, Krupa Gandhi and Kathryn L. Braun. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Advanced Energy Materials, Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, Nutrients and Ethnicity and Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact