John Hoekman

737 total citations
22 papers, 584 citations indexed

About

John Hoekman is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Pharmaceutical Science and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, John Hoekman has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 584 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Sensory Systems, 5 papers in Pharmaceutical Science and 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in John Hoekman's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (6 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (5 papers) and Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (5 papers). John Hoekman is often cited by papers focused on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (6 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (5 papers) and Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (5 papers). John Hoekman collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. John Hoekman's co-authors include Rodney J. Y. Ho, Stephen B. Shrewsbury, Leah R. Hanson, Paula Martínez, William H. Frey, Valerie G. Coppes, S. Scott Panter, Stephen D. Silberstein, Sheena K. Aurora and Vincent T. Martin and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Neurology and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

In The Last Decade

John Hoekman

22 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Hoekman United States 13 177 161 100 93 72 22 584
Tyler P. Crowe United States 4 226 1.3× 275 1.7× 48 0.5× 27 0.3× 63 0.9× 6 669
Benjamin R. Yerxa United States 18 398 2.2× 96 0.6× 85 0.8× 65 0.7× 49 0.7× 49 1.3k
Jiao Liang China 13 387 2.2× 32 0.2× 31 0.3× 94 1.0× 11 0.2× 26 839
Ralf G. Rempe United States 8 255 1.4× 25 0.2× 44 0.4× 70 0.8× 7 0.1× 9 854
Jian Pei China 14 126 0.7× 27 0.2× 27 0.3× 77 0.8× 7 0.1× 50 669
Robert S. Pulido United States 3 196 1.1× 20 0.1× 24 0.2× 30 0.3× 6 0.1× 3 620
Sarah C. Brennan Australia 18 393 2.2× 20 0.1× 87 0.9× 21 0.2× 51 0.7× 26 869
Emine Şekerdağ Türkiye 8 198 1.1× 149 0.9× 30 0.3× 7 0.1× 5 0.1× 11 513
Kerri Hallene United States 12 340 1.9× 16 0.1× 41 0.4× 317 3.4× 5 0.1× 12 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by John Hoekman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Hoekman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hoekman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hoekman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Hoekman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hoekman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hoekman. The network helps show where John Hoekman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Hoekman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Hoekman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Hoekman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Hoekman. John Hoekman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ray, Sutapa, et al.. (2022). Delivery of Dihydroergotamine Mesylate to the Upper Nasal Space for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: Technology in Action. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery. 35(6). 321–332. 12 indexed citations
2.
Shrewsbury, Stephen B., et al.. (2022). The Pharmacokinetics of Drug Delivery to the Upper Nasal Space: A Review of INP105 Development. Medical Research Archives. 10(9). 4 indexed citations
3.
Craig, Karen, et al.. (2021). Cardiovascular Safety Results of INP104 (POD-DHE) from the STOP 301 Phase 3 Study (2493). Neurology. 96(15_supplement). 4 indexed citations
4.
Aurora, Sheena K., et al.. (2021). DHE Pharmacology Revisited: Does a broad receptor profile molecule treat the whole migraine? (2496). Neurology. 96(15_supplement). 1 indexed citations
5.
Hoekman, John, Sutapa Ray, Sheena K. Aurora, & Stephen B. Shrewsbury. (2020). The Upper Nasal Space—A Novel Delivery Route Ideal for Central Nervous System Drugs. 16(1). 25–25. 17 indexed citations
6.
Shrewsbury, Stephen B., et al.. (2020). The SNAP 101 Double-Blind, Placebo/Active-Controlled, Safety, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of INP105 (Nasal Olanzapine) in Healthy Adults. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 81(4). 16 indexed citations
7.
Campbell, John, et al.. (2019). Placebo/Active Controlled, Safety, Pharmaco-Kinetic/Dynamic Study of INP105 (POD® olanzapine) in Healthy Adults. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 20(2). 1 indexed citations
9.
Silberstein, Stephen D., Stephen B. Shrewsbury, & John Hoekman. (2019). Dihydroergotamine (DHE) – Then and Now: A Narrative Review. Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 60(1). 40–57. 45 indexed citations
10.
Bittner, Genevieve C. Van de, Hsiao‐Ying Wey, Wayne Rowe, et al.. (2017). Positron Emission Tomography Assessment of the Intranasal Delivery Route for Orexin A. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 9(2). 358–368. 23 indexed citations
11.
Hoekman, John, Pramod K. Srivastava, & Rodney J. Y. Ho. (2014). Aerosol-Stable Peptide-Coated Liposome Nanoparticles: A Proof-of-Concept Study with Opioid Fentanyl in Enhancing Analgesic Effects and Reducing Plasma Drug Exposure. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 103(8). 2231–2239. 25 indexed citations
12.
Hanson, Leah R., Jared M. Fine, John Hoekman, et al.. (2012). Intranasal delivery of growth differentiation factor 5 to the central nervous system. Drug Delivery. 19(3). 149–154. 27 indexed citations
13.
Hoekman, John & Rodney J. Y. Ho. (2011). Enhanced Analgesic Responses After Preferential Delivery of Morphine and Fentanyl to the Olfactory Epithelium in Rats. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 113(3). 641–651. 43 indexed citations
14.
Hoekman, John & Rodney J. Y. Ho. (2011). Effects of Localized Hydrophilic Mannitol and Hydrophobic Nelfinavir Administration Targeted to Olfactory Epithelium on Brain Distribution. AAPS PharmSciTech. 12(2). 534–543. 42 indexed citations
15.
Bui, Tot, et al.. (2010). Novel Gd Nanoparticles Enhance Vascular Contrast for High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging. PLoS ONE. 5(9). e13082–e13082. 46 indexed citations
16.
Hanson, Leah R., Paula Martínez, Valerie G. Coppes, et al.. (2009). Intranasal Deferoxamine Provides Increased Brain Exposure and Significant Protection in Rat Ischemic Stroke. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 330(3). 679–686. 184 indexed citations
17.
Pulliam, Lynn, Bing Sun, Hans Rempel, et al.. (2007). Intranasal Tat Alters Gene Expression in the Mouse Brain. Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology. 2(1). 87–92. 9 indexed citations
18.
Hoekman, John, et al.. (2006). Intranasal Delivery of Insulin–Like Growth Factor–1 Distributes to the Optic Nerve and Retina in the Rat. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 47(13). 728–728. 1 indexed citations
19.
Hoekman, John, et al.. (2006). Molecular Modeling of the Calmodulin Binding Region of Calcineurin. The Protein Journal. 25(3). 175–182. 2 indexed citations
20.
Hoekman, John, et al.. (2005). Identification of mouse brain proteins associated with isoform 3 of metallothionein. Protein Science. 14(5). 1151–1157. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026