John Helmes
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 1%
- Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Usability and User Interface Design
- Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
-
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 8
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 7
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts 2
- Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology 1
- Co-authors
- Abigail Sellen (3 shared papers)Siân Lindley (6 shared papers)Xiang Cao (4 shared papers)Nicolas Villar (5 shared papers)Steve Hodges (5 shared papers)Xiang Cao (2 shared papers)Shahram Izadi (2 shared papers)Elise van den Hoven (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Electronic workshops in computing (1 paper)TU/e Research Portal (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
John Helmes
15 papers receiving 291 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Human-Computer Interaction 243
- Cognitive Neuroscience 89
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 62
- Computer Science Applications 14
- Speech and Hearing 17
Countries citing papers authored by John Helmes
This map shows the geographic impact of John Helmes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Helmes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Helmes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Helmes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Helmes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Helmes. The network helps show where John Helmes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Helmes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 70 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1 |
About John Helmes
John Helmes is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Science Applications, Museology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 15 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (8 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (7 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (2 papers), Green IT and Sustainability (2 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (1 paper) and Design Education and Practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (243 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (89 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (62 citations), Computer Science Applications (14 citations) and Speech and Hearing (17 citations). John Helmes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Abigail Sellen, Siân Lindley, Xiang Cao, Nicolas Villar, Steve Hodges, Xiang Cao, Shahram Izadi, Elise van den Hoven, Martijn ten Bhömer and Kenton O’Hara. Their work appears in journals such as Electronic workshops in computing and TU/e Research Portal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.