John Hayden

51 papers receiving 840 citations

Peers

John Hayden
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 144
  • Developmental Neuroscience 88
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 77
  • Family Practice 38
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 73
Replace Jo Taylor with:
Jo Taylor United Kingdom
Gregg Warshaw United States
Stephanie J. Phelps United States
M. Caroline Burton United States
Michael McCubbin United States
Lauren Yaeger United States
Tracy M. Hagemann United States
Peter J. Dunbar United States
Michael J. Cawley United States
Cyril M. Grum United States
John Hayden relative to Jo Taylor United Kingdom Jo Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Jo Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Hayden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Hayden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hayden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hayden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Hayden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hayden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hayden. The network helps show where John Hayden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Hayden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Hayden Line = papers co-authored together John Hayden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Caring for the Psychological Well-Being of Healthcare Professionals in the Covid-19 Pandemic Crisis.
2020101
2 202080
3 199374
4 202258
5 201554
6 197949
7 201547
8 201136
9 202036
10 202332
11 201229
12 198727
13 200920
14 202220
15 202020
16 201719
17 196318
18 202217
19 202215
20 201213

About John Hayden

John Hayden is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 58 papers that have together received 889 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (11 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (8 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (7 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (7 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (6 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (144 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (88 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (77 citations), Family Practice (38 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (73 citations). John Hayden has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Parkin, Fiona McNicholas, Blánaid Gavin, Dimitrios Adamis, Mohinder A. Mital, Paul Gallagher, Sean Walsh, Abel Wakai, Siobhán McCoy and Ronan O’Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, BMJ Open, Journal of Psychiatric Research, International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact