John H. Contois
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 0.5%
- Surgery top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Physiology top 5%
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ernst J. SchaeferJudith McNamaraAllan D. SnidermanCurt D. FurbergKen WilliamsJacqueline de GraafG. Russell WarnickPeter W.F. Wilson
- Topics
- Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (22 papers)Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (21 papers)Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
John H. Contois
49 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 1.6k
- Surgery 1.6k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 686
- Physiology 535
- Cancer Research 520
Countries citing papers authored by John H. Contois
This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Contois's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Contois with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Contois more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Contois
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Contois. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Contois. The network helps show where John H. Contois may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John H. Contois
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John H. Contois. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John H. Contois based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John H. Contois. John H. Contois is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 73 | |
| 4 | A blood-based diagnostic test incorporating plasma Aβ42/40 ratio, ApoE proteotype, and age accurately identifies brain amyloid status: findings from a multi cohort validity analysisbreakdown → | 136 |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 71 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 472 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 67 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 126 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 97 | |
| 16 | 115 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 81 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About John H. Contois
John H. Contois is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Biochemistry and Cancer Research, having authored 49 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (22 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (21 papers) and Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.6k citations), Surgery (1.6k citations) and Cancer Research (520 citations). John H. Contois has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ernst J. Schaefer, Judith McNamara, Allan D. Sniderman, Curt D. Furberg, Ken Williams, Jacqueline de Graaf, G. Russell Warnick, Peter W.F. Wilson, Carol J. Lammi‐Keefe and Matthew McQueen. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Nutrition and Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.