John Goodwin

1.1k total citations
27 papers, 847 citations indexed

About

John Goodwin is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, John Goodwin has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 847 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Accounting, 15 papers in Strategy and Management and 6 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in John Goodwin's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (21 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (19 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (14 papers). John Goodwin is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (21 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (19 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (14 papers). John Goodwin collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Türkiye and Hong Kong. John Goodwin's co-authors include Donghui Wu, Kamran Ahmed, Ferdinand A. Gul, Richard Heaney, Simon Fung, Barry J. Cooper, Shireenjit Johl, Mark A. Bliss, Yiğit Atılgan and James Routledge and has published in prestigious journals such as The Accounting Review, Contemporary Accounting Research and Review of Accounting Studies.

In The Last Decade

John Goodwin

24 papers receiving 772 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John Goodwin Australia	12	807	419	184	88	65	27	847
Cory A. Cassell United States	14	840 1.0×	304 0.7×	243 1.3×	109 1.2×	77 1.2×	35	892
Mark Soliman United States	11	481 0.6×	281 0.7×	209 1.1×	42 0.5×	56 0.9×	13	538
Billy S. Soo United States	8	773 1.0×	289 0.7×	154 0.8×	109 1.2×	51 0.8×	12	805
Ananth Seetharaman United States	10	718 0.9×	247 0.6×	170 0.9×	47 0.5×	155 2.4×	23	760
H. Charles Sparks United States	3	1.2k 1.5×	621 1.5×	224 1.2×	113 1.3×	62 1.0×	5	1.2k
Ewa Sletten United States	11	621 0.8×	255 0.6×	207 1.1×	55 0.6×	81 1.2×	16	671
Steve Lin United States	13	570 0.7×	319 0.8×	182 1.0×	33 0.4×	59 0.9×	27	603
Timothy A. Seidel United States	13	561 0.7×	205 0.5×	113 0.6×	100 1.1×	45 0.7×	50	629
Igor Goncharov United Kingdom	14	585 0.7×	353 0.8×	108 0.6×	41 0.5×	92 1.4×	32	666
Kenneth L. Bills United States	11	596 0.7×	204 0.5×	118 0.6×	104 1.2×	65 1.0×	28	674

Countries citing papers authored by John Goodwin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Goodwin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Goodwin. The network helps show where John Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Goodwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Goodwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Goodwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Goodwin. John Goodwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Goodwin, John, et al.. (2024). The Consequences of Audit Firm Mergers for Audit Quality: Partner-Level Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Goodwin, John, et al.. (2018). Investor reaction to accounting misstatements under IFRS: Australian evidence. Accounting and Finance. 60(3). 2467–2512. 2 indexed citations

Goodwin, John, et al.. (2017). Investor Reaction to Accounting Misstatements Under IFRS: Australian Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Goodwin, John & Donghui Wu. (2014). Is the effect of industry expertise on audit pricing an office-level or a partner-level phenomenon?. Review of Accounting Studies. 19(4). 1532–1578. 132 indexed citations

Fung, Simon & John Goodwin. (2013). Short-term debt maturity, monitoring and accruals-based earnings management. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics. 9(1). 67–82. 61 indexed citations

Goodwin, John. (2011). Audit Partner Busyness and Audit Quality. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations

Gul, Ferdinand A. & John Goodwin. (2010). Short-term debt maturity structures, credit ratings, and the pricing of audit services. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 12 indexed citations

Goodwin, John, Kamran Ahmed, & Richard Heaney. (2009). Corporate Governance and the Prediction of the Impact of AIFRS Adoption. Abacus. 45(1). 124–145. 24 indexed citations

Goodwin, John, Kamran Ahmed, & Richard Heaney. (2008). The Effects of International Financial Reporting Standards on the Accounts and Accounting Quality of Australian Firms: A Retrospective Study. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 5 indexed citations

10.

Goodwin, John, Barry J. Cooper, & Shireenjit Johl. (2008). How Prepared was Australia for International Financial Reporting Standards? The Case of Listed Firms. Australian Accounting Review. 18(1). 35–45. 15 indexed citations

11.

Goodwin, John, Kamran Ahmed, & Richard Heaney. (2008). The Effects of International Financial Reporting Standards on the Accounts and Accounting Quality of Australian Firms: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics. 4(2). 89–119. 107 indexed citations

12.

Goodwin, John, Kamran Ahmed, & Richard Heaney. (2007). Are components of reconciliations to international financial reporting standards useful to investors. PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University). 2 indexed citations

13.

Goodwin, John & Kamran Ahmed. (2006). The impact of international financial reporting standards: does size matter?. Managerial Auditing Journal. 21(5). 460–475. 38 indexed citations

14.

Goodwin, John & Kamran Ahmed. (2006). Longitudinal value relevance of earnings and intangible assets: Evidence from Australian firms. Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation. 15(1). 72–91. 64 indexed citations

15.

Ahmed, Kamran & John Goodwin. (2006). An empirical investigation of earnings restatements by Australian firms. Accounting and Finance. 47(1). 1–22. 40 indexed citations

16.

Goodwin, John & Kamran Ahmed. (2005). Longitudinal Value Relevance of Earnings and Intangible Assets: Evidence from Australian Firms. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 3 indexed citations

17.

Goodwin, John. (2003). Longitudinal Earnings Value Relevance and Intangible Assets: Evidence from Australian Firms, 1975-99. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

18.

Goodwin, John. (2002). Longitudinal Earnings Value Relevance and Intangible Assets: Evidence from Australian Firms, 1975-99. SSRN Electronic Journal. 8 indexed citations

19.

Goodwin, John, et al.. (2002). The Relevance of Value. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

20.

Goodwin, John, et al.. (1998). Corporate Governance in Singapore. Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University). 5(1). 1. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact