John Gleaves

3.1k total citations
74 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

John Gleaves is a scholar working on Catalysis, Materials Chemistry and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John Gleaves has authored 74 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Catalysis, 35 papers in Materials Chemistry and 30 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in John Gleaves's work include Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (36 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (33 papers) and Doping in Sports (27 papers). John Gleaves is often cited by papers focused on Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (36 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (33 papers) and Doping in Sports (27 papers). John Gleaves collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and United Kingdom. John Gleaves's co-authors include Jerry R. Ebner, Yves Schuurman, T. C. Kuechler, Gregory S. Yablonsky, G. S. Yablonskii, Phungphai Phanawadee, Sergiy O. Shekhtman, Rebecca Fushimi, G.S. Yablonsky and Denis Constales and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, ACS Catalysis and Journal of Catalysis.

In The Last Decade

John Gleaves

73 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Gleaves United States 23 1.5k 1.4k 330 304 289 74 2.1k
Oliver Rubner Germany 15 305 0.2× 146 0.1× 56 0.2× 106 0.3× 18 0.1× 27 950
Wei Zhuang China 34 1.1k 0.7× 120 0.1× 59 0.2× 139 0.5× 39 0.1× 126 3.6k
Sonja Grigoleit Germany 11 725 0.5× 354 0.3× 20 0.1× 168 0.6× 74 0.3× 15 1.0k
Richard M. Stephenson United States 15 415 0.3× 98 0.1× 160 0.5× 35 0.1× 100 0.3× 31 1.8k
Peter Atkins United Kingdom 13 313 0.2× 71 0.1× 22 0.1× 95 0.3× 83 0.3× 30 1.3k
Simon Bates United Kingdom 27 1.0k 0.7× 97 0.1× 8 0.0× 301 1.0× 87 0.3× 78 2.5k
Jie Kong China 17 470 0.3× 54 0.0× 161 0.5× 14 0.0× 28 0.1× 62 980
Maurício J. Piotrowski Brazil 22 1.3k 0.9× 220 0.2× 6 0.0× 92 0.3× 45 0.2× 86 1.6k
Hang Yin China 29 1.4k 0.9× 26 0.0× 26 0.1× 33 0.1× 40 0.1× 134 2.7k
Luis A. Pérez Mexico 21 1.0k 0.7× 116 0.1× 19 0.1× 30 0.1× 22 0.1× 103 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by John Gleaves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Gleaves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Gleaves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Gleaves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Gleaves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Gleaves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Gleaves. The network helps show where John Gleaves may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Gleaves

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Gleaves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Gleaves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Gleaves. John Gleaves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Gleaves, John, Andrea Petróczi, Dirk Folkerts, et al.. (2021). Doping Prevalence in Competitive Sport: Evidence Synthesis with “Best Practice” Recommendations and Reporting Guidelines from the WADA Working Group on Doping Prevalence. Sports Medicine. 51(9). 1909–1934. 49 indexed citations
3.
Gleaves, John. (2021). A Moral Examination of the Therapeutic Use Exemption in Anti-Doping. 2(1). 53–71. 2 indexed citations
4.
Dyreson, Mark, et al.. (2017). History and Philosophy of Sport and Physical Activity. Human Kinetics eBooks. 10 indexed citations
5.
Gleaves, John. (2017). Sport as meaningful narratives. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. 44(1). 29–43. 7 indexed citations
6.
Yablonsky, Gregory S., E. Redekop, Denis Constales, John Gleaves, & Guy Marin. (2016). Rate-Reactivity Model: A New Theoretical Basis for Systematic Kinetic Characterization of Heterogeneous Catalysts. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics. 48(6). 304–317. 12 indexed citations
7.
Gleaves, John, et al.. (2015). The Historical Legacy of the 1984 Los Angeles Olympic Games. The International Journal of the History of Sport. 32(1). 1–8. 4 indexed citations
8.
Gleaves, John, et al.. (2014). Before the rules are written: navigating moral ambiguity in performance enhancement. Sport Ethics and Philosophy. 8(1). 85–99. 6 indexed citations
9.
Gleaves, John. (2014). Manufactured Dope: How the 1984 US Olympic Cycling Team Rewrote the Rules on Drugs in Sports. The International Journal of the History of Sport. 32(1). 89–107. 9 indexed citations
10.
Gleaves, John. (2013). Exploring New Avenues to the Doping Debate in Sports: A Test-Relevant Approach. RACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya). 1(2). 39–63. 3 indexed citations
11.
Gleaves, John. (2011). A New Conceptual Gloss that Still Lacks Luster: Critiquing Morgan’s Treatment-Enhancement Distinction. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. 38(1). 103–112. 1 indexed citations
12.
Redekop, E., et al.. (2011). The Y-Procedure methodology for the interpretation of transient kinetic data: Analysis of irreversible adsorption. Chemical Engineering Science. 66(24). 6441–6452. 30 indexed citations
13.
Gleaves, John. (2010). No Harm, No Foul? Justifying Bans On Safe Performance-Enhancing Drugs. Sport Ethics and Philosophy. 4(3). 269–283. 9 indexed citations
14.
Fushimi, Rebecca, John Gleaves, Gregory S. Yablonsky, et al.. (2006). Combining TAP-2 experiments with atomic beam deposition of Pd on quartz particles. Catalysis Today. 121(3-4). 170–186. 9 indexed citations
15.
Shekhtman, Sergiy O., Gregory S. Yablonsky, John Gleaves, & Rebecca Fushimi. (2003). “State defining” experiment in chemical kinetics—primary characterization of catalyst activity in a TAP experiment. Chemical Engineering Science. 58(21). 4843–4859. 52 indexed citations
16.
Phanawadee, Phungphai, et al.. (2003). Uniformity in a thin-zone multi-pulse TAP experiment: numerical analysis. Chemical Engineering Science. 58(11). 2215–2227. 29 indexed citations
17.
Constales, Denis, G.S. Yablonsky, Guy Marin, & John Gleaves. (2001). Multi-zone TAP-reactors theory and application: I. The global transfer matrix equation. Chemical Engineering Science. 56(1). 133–149. 35 indexed citations
18.
Gleaves, John, et al.. (1992). Selective oxidation of n-pentane and 2-pentene over (VO)2P2O7: continuous-flow and transient studies at subatmospheric pressures. Journal of Molecular Catalysis. 73(3). 353–369. 14 indexed citations
19.
Centi, Gabriele, Ferruccio Trifirò, Guido Busca, Jerry R. Ebner, & John Gleaves. (1989). Nature of active species of (VO)2P2O7for selective oxidation of n-butane to maleic anhydride. Faraday Discussions of the Chemical Society. 87(0). 215–225. 51 indexed citations
20.
Gleaves, John, Jerry R. Ebner, & T. C. Kuechler. (1988). Temporal Analysis of Products (TAP)—A Unique Catalyst Evaluation System with Submillisecond Time Resolution. Catalysis Reviews. 30(1). 49–116. 328 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026