John G. Piper

742 total citations
15 papers, 467 citations indexed

About

John G. Piper is a scholar working on Surgery, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, John G. Piper has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 467 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Neurology and 3 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in John G. Piper's work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (3 papers) and Spinal Hematomas and Complications (2 papers). John G. Piper is often cited by papers focused on Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (3 papers) and Spinal Hematomas and Complications (2 papers). John G. Piper collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. John G. Piper's co-authors include Arnold H. Menezes, Michael G. Muhonen, Kenneth A. Follett, Brian Charlesworth, Patrick W. Hitchon, John C. VanGilder, Gerald H. Clamon, Viney Kumar, Michael P. Jones and Steven A. Moore and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain Research, Pain and Journal of neurosurgery.

In The Last Decade

John G. Piper

15 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

John G. Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Surgery 254
  • Neurology 102
  • Physiology 94
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 93
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 68
Replace David F. Moorhouse with:
David F. Moorhouse United States
Vijay S. Dayal Canada
B Gebhardt Germany
M.J. Sánchez-Ledesma Spain
L. Halpern Israel
Peter Zimmermann Germany
Hitoshi Takahashi Japan
Hitoshi Fujioka Japan
Carroll Warren United States
G. Salar Italy
David F. Moorhouse United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to John G. Piper
John G. Piper · 1×
Citations per year, relative to John G. Piper
John G. Piper · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by John G. Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John G. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G. Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John G. Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G. Piper. The network helps show where John G. Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John G. Piper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John G. Piper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John G. Piper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John G. Piper. John G. Piper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 10
2 13
3 26
4 11
5 32
6 32
7 43
8 95
9 9
10 1
11 17
12 2
13 44
14 83
15 49

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026