John G. Pearce

601 total citations
33 papers, 477 citations indexed

About

John G. Pearce is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology and Control and Systems Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, John G. Pearce has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 477 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 6 papers in Ophthalmology and 5 papers in Control and Systems Engineering. Recurrent topics in John G. Pearce's work include Simulation Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (3 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers). John G. Pearce is often cited by papers focused on Simulation Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (3 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers). John G. Pearce collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. John G. Pearce's co-authors include Malcolm C. Pike, Yuri R. Parisky, Darcy Spicer, Giske Ursin, Ted Maddess, Norman L. Patt, Donna Shoupe, Andy Pike, Melvin A. Astrahan and John R. Daniels and has published in prestigious journals such as JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Radiology and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

In The Last Decade

John G. Pearce

31 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John G. Pearce United States 11 219 202 108 100 98 33 477
G Cooke Canada 9 354 1.6× 216 1.1× 312 2.9× 139 1.4× 170 1.7× 12 648
L K Joynt United States 9 48 0.2× 88 0.4× 83 0.8× 124 1.2× 120 1.2× 10 360
Fatma Tokat Türkiye 12 92 0.4× 67 0.3× 46 0.4× 89 0.9× 23 0.2× 45 378
Justinas Besusparis Lithuania 10 31 0.1× 114 0.6× 146 1.4× 115 1.1× 112 1.1× 29 369
Matthew Perez United States 15 94 0.4× 438 2.2× 33 0.3× 22 0.2× 33 0.3× 52 659
Geoffrey Smith United States 13 80 0.4× 163 0.8× 98 0.9× 98 1.0× 54 0.6× 45 492
Hildegard Toth United States 6 158 0.7× 169 0.8× 134 1.2× 117 1.2× 103 1.1× 6 397
Linda J. Warren Burhenne Canada 11 217 1.0× 484 2.4× 489 4.5× 269 2.7× 133 1.4× 15 853
Xiao Hu China 12 263 1.2× 308 1.5× 127 1.2× 253 2.5× 37 0.4× 40 631
Karin Leifland Sweden 19 437 2.0× 383 1.9× 413 3.8× 292 2.9× 273 2.8× 30 981

Countries citing papers authored by John G. Pearce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John G. Pearce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G. Pearce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G. Pearce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John G. Pearce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G. Pearce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G. Pearce. The network helps show where John G. Pearce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John G. Pearce

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John G. Pearce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John G. Pearce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John G. Pearce. John G. Pearce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Pearce, John G., Mark Naunton, & Ted Maddess. (2022). A Literature-Based Review and Analysis of the Pharmacodynamics of the Dose Frequency of Topical 0.3% Ciprofloxacin and 0.3% Ofloxacin in the Day-1 Treatment of Bacterial Keratitis. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 39(1). 17–26. 1 indexed citations
3.
Pearce, John G., Rohan W. Essex, & Ted Maddess. (2022). The clinical treatment of bacterial keratitis: A review of drop instillation regimes. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 45(6). 101725–101725. 10 indexed citations
4.
Pearce, John G. & Ted Maddess. (2018). The Clinical Interpretation of Changes in Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Review. Journal of Glaucoma. 28(4). 302–306. 19 indexed citations
5.
Pearce, John G. & Ted Maddess. (2016). Diurnal variation in summary measures and inter-visit test-retest variability of standard automated perimetry and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12). 4228–4228. 1 indexed citations
6.
Pearce, John G. & Ted Maddess. (2016). Inter‐visit Test‐Retest Variability of OCT in Glaucoma. Optometry and Vision Science. 94(3). 404–410. 12 indexed citations
7.
Pearce, John G. & Ted Maddess. (2016). Retest Variability in the Medmont M700 Automated Perimeter. Optometry and Vision Science. 93(3). 272–280. 9 indexed citations
8.
Counsell, John, et al.. (2012). Design and simulation of a non-linear, discontinuous, flight control system using rate actuated inverse dynamics. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 227(4). 632–646. 1 indexed citations
9.
Subesinghe, Manil, John G. Pearce, Christopher Hammond, Ross Robertson, & Simon McPherson. (2011). Pulmonary artery embolization for recurrent haemoptysis in cavitatory sarcoidosis. Clinical Radiology. 66(5). 478–480. 2 indexed citations
10.
Pearce, John G., et al.. (2009). Developments and Applications of Multi-rate Simulation. 129–133. 5 indexed citations
11.
Formenti, Silvia C., et al.. (1998). Comprehensive needs assessment of clinical breast evaluation skills of primary care residents. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 5(2). 166–172. 9 indexed citations
12.
Ursin, Giske, Melvin A. Astrahan, Martine Salane, et al.. (1998). The detection of changes in mammographic densities.. PubMed. 7(1). 43–7. 128 indexed citations
13.
Dunnington, Gary L., John G. Pearce, Andy Sherrod, & Rick Cote. (1995). Breast carcinoma presenting as mammographic microcalcifications in axillary lymph nodes. Breast Disease. 8(2). 193–198. 3 indexed citations
14.
Bassett, L W, et al.. (1995). Effects of a program to train radiologic technologists to identify abnormalities on mammograms.. Radiology. 194(1). 189–192. 23 indexed citations
15.
Spicer, Darcy, Giske Ursin, Yuri R. Parisky, et al.. (1994). Changes in Mammographic Densities Induced by a Hormonal Contraceptive Designed to Reduce Breast Cancer Risk. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 86(6). 431–436. 115 indexed citations
16.
Pearce, John G., et al.. (1985). ESL - A new Continuous System Simulation Language. SIMULATION. 44(5). 242–246. 3 indexed citations
17.
Johnson, Richard J., Charles J. Gomer, & John G. Pearce. (1976). An investigation of the radiosensitizing effects of RO-07-0582 on hypoxic skin in primates. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 1(7-8). 593–599. 12 indexed citations
18.
Pearce, John G. & Norman L. Patt. (1974). Fatal Pulmonary Hemorrhage After Percutaneous Aspiration Lung Biopsy 1. American Review of Respiratory Disease. 110(3). 346–349. 34 indexed citations
19.
Garland, Hugh, et al.. (1965). Iatrogenic Vertebral Arteriovenous Fistula. BMJ. 1(5432). 406–430. 7 indexed citations
20.
Pearce, John G., et al.. (1961). Intraductal papilloma of the breast.. PubMed. 112. 153–8. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026