John G. Linn

2.4k total citations
100 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

John G. Linn is a scholar working on Surgery, Gastroenterology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, John G. Linn has authored 100 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 94 papers in Surgery, 30 papers in Gastroenterology and 18 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in John G. Linn's work include Esophageal and GI Pathology (30 papers), Hernia repair and management (30 papers) and Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (26 papers). John G. Linn is often cited by papers focused on Esophageal and GI Pathology (30 papers), Hernia repair and management (30 papers) and Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (26 papers). John G. Linn collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Philippines. John G. Linn's co-authors include Michael Ujiki, Woody Denham, JoAnn Carbray, Kristine Kuchta, Amy Yetasook, Stephen P. Haggerty, Matthew E. Gitelis, Yalini Vigneswaran, Brittany Lapin and Mikhail Attaar and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Gastroenterology and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

John G. Linn

97 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

John G. Linn
Francisco Schlottmann United States
Raymond R. Price United States
Matthew E. Gitelis United States
Miloslawa Stem United States
Michael L. Brunt United States
Mark L. Wulkan United States
Geoffrey P. Kohn United States
Kenneth W. Sharp United States
Abdelkader Hawasli United States
Muhammed Ashraf Memon United Kingdom
Francisco Schlottmann United States
John G. Linn
Citations per year, relative to John G. Linn John G. Linn (= 1×) peers Francisco Schlottmann

Countries citing papers authored by John G. Linn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John G. Linn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G. Linn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G. Linn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John G. Linn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G. Linn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G. Linn. The network helps show where John G. Linn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John G. Linn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John G. Linn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John G. Linn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John G. Linn. John G. Linn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Amundson, Julia R., Kristine Kuchta, H. Mason Hedberg, et al.. (2024). Comparable improvement and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: single-center study. Surgical Endoscopy. 38(10). 5914–5921. 2 indexed citations
2.
Wong, Harry J., Kristine Kuchta, John G. Linn, et al.. (2022). Subjective vs. objective assessment of simulation performance on laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are we evaluating the right things?. Surgical Endoscopy. 36(9). 6661–6671.
3.
Campbell, Michelle, Mikhail Attaar, Harry J. Wong, et al.. (2022). Patient-reported bowel and bladder function is not adversely impacted by bariatric surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 36(9). 6896–6902. 1 indexed citations
4.
Wong, Harry J., Julia R. Amundson, Michelle Campbell, et al.. (2022). Teaching endoscopic management of gastrointestinal hemorrhage using a modular simulation curriculum. Surgery. 173(3). 702–709.
5.
Attaar, Mikhail, Harry J. Wong, Michelle Campbell, et al.. (2021). Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) measurements persist long term after anti-reflux surgery. Surgery. 171(3). 628–634. 7 indexed citations
6.
Attaar, Mikhail, Bailey Su, Harry J. Wong, et al.. (2021). Significant changes in impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) measurements after peroral pyloromyotomy for delayed gastric emptying. Surgical Endoscopy. 36(2). 1536–1543. 14 indexed citations
7.
Su, Bailey, Mikhail Attaar, Harry J. Wong, et al.. (2020). Using a standardized intra-operative endoflip protocol during fundoplication to identify factors that affect distensibility. Surgical Endoscopy. 35(10). 5717–5723. 15 indexed citations
8.
Su, Bailey, Harry J. Wong, Mikhail Attaar, et al.. (2020). Comparing short-term patient outcomes after fundoplication performed over a traditional bougie versus a functional lumen imaging probe. Surgery. 169(3). 533–538. 2 indexed citations
9.
Attaar, Mikhail, Kristine Kuchta, Woody Denham, et al.. (2020). Predictors of chronic pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surgery. 169(3). 586–594. 18 indexed citations
10.
Attaar, Mikhail, Bailey Su, Harry J. Wong, et al.. (2020). Comparing cost and outcomes between peroral endoscopic myotomy and laparoscopic heller myotomy. The American Journal of Surgery. 222(1). 208–213. 13 indexed citations
11.
Attaar, Mikhail, Bailey Su, Harry J. Wong, et al.. (2020). Intraoperative impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) results and development of esophagitis in patients undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surgical Endoscopy. 35(8). 4555–4562. 27 indexed citations
12.
Kuchta, Kristine, JoAnn Carbray, John G. Linn, et al.. (2018). Effects of dexamethasone on postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surgical Endoscopy. 33(9). 3008–3013. 8 indexed citations
13.
Hedberg, H. Mason, Tyler Hall, Matthew E. Gitelis, et al.. (2017). Quality of life after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of an asymptomatic inguinal hernia. Surgical Endoscopy. 32(2). 813–819. 8 indexed citations
14.
Roth, J. Scott, Gary J. Anthone, Don J. Selzer, et al.. (2017). Prospective evaluation of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh in CDC class I/high-risk ventral and incisional hernia repair: 18-month follow-up. Surgical Endoscopy. 32(4). 1929–1936. 67 indexed citations
15.
Patel, Lava Y., Brittany Lapin, Matthew E. Gitelis, et al.. (2016). Long-term patterns and predictors of pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a patient-centered analysis. Surgical Endoscopy. 31(5). 2109–2121. 10 indexed citations
16.
Denham, Woody, et al.. (2016). Primary obesity surgery endoluminal. Surgical Endoscopy. 31(2). 951–951. 3 indexed citations
17.
Patel, Lava Y., Brittany Lapin, Craig S. Brown, et al.. (2016). Outcomes following 50 consecutive endoscopic gastrojejunal revisions for weight gain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of endoscopic suturing techniques for stoma reduction. Surgical Endoscopy. 31(6). 2667–2677. 30 indexed citations
18.
Chaudhry, Umer I., et al.. (2014). Bioabsorbable Hernia Plugs in Laparoscopic Inguinal Herniorraphy. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 25(2). 163–167. 3 indexed citations
19.
Zapf, Matthew, Woody Denham, Ermilo Barrera, et al.. (2013). Patient-centered outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 27(12). 4491–4498. 30 indexed citations
20.
Bilimoria, Karl Y., David J. Bentrem, John G. Linn, et al.. (2007). Utilization of total thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer in the United States. Surgery. 142(6). 906–913.e2. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026