John Fought

547 citations
22 papers · 241 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

John Fought

19 papers receiving 191 citations

Peers

John Fought
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Linguistics and Language 124
  • Developmental Biology 26
  • Language and Linguistics 123
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 79
  • Cultural Studies 48
Replace Arthur Holmer with:
Arthur Holmer United States
Lev Michael United States
Robert Lawrence Trask United Kingdom
Carmen Fought United States
George Tucker Childs United States
Reyes I. Fidalgo
Rob Pensalfini Australia
Allan Keiler
Hannah S. Sarvasy Australia
Paolo Ramat Italy
John Fought relative to Arthur Holmer United States Arthur Holmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Arthur Holmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Fought

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Fought's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Fought with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Fought more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Fought

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Fought. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Fought. The network helps show where John Fought may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside John Fought, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Fought Line = papers co-authored together John Fought links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
American dialect research
199380
2 198147
3 200440
4 200921
5 197211
6 20007
7 19995
8 19795
9 19724
10 19704
11 19733
12 20073
13
Chorti (Mayan) : phonology, morphophonemics, and morphology
19672
14 19692
15 19732
16 19871
17 19821
18 19821
19 19781
20 19931

About John Fought

John Fought is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Developmental Biology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 22 papers that have together received 241 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Linguistic Variation and Morphology (8 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (8 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers), Language and cultural evolution (2 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (2 papers) and Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (124 citations), Developmental Biology (26 citations), Language and Linguistics (123 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (79 citations) and Cultural Studies (48 citations). John Fought has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dennis R. Preston, Dell Hymes, Robert L. Munroe, Carmen Fought, Ronald K. S. Macaulay and Yuen Ren Chao. Their work appears in journals such as American Anthropologist, Language in Society, Language, Annual Review of Anthropology and Cross-Cultural Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact