John Fitch

94 total papers · 675 total citations
50 papers, 326 citations indexed

About

John Fitch is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Hardware and Architecture. According to data from OpenAlex, John Fitch has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 326 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics, 10 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 9 papers in Hardware and Architecture. Recurrent topics in John Fitch's work include Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (9 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers) and Numerical Methods and Algorithms (6 papers). John Fitch is often cited by papers focused on Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (9 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers) and Numerical Methods and Algorithms (6 papers). John Fitch collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Sudan and United States. John Fitch's co-authors include Dávid Barton, Richard Pavelle, A. C. Norman, R. A. Lyttleton, Jean Della Dora, Martin Brain, J.R. Banerjee, A.J. Sobey, Marina De Vos and H. Su and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Communications of the ACM and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

John Fitch

42 papers receiving 275 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
John Fitch 76 74 46 40 33 50 326
Tim Hopkins 66 0.9× 29 0.4× 20 0.4× 24 0.6× 10 0.3× 46 228
Bernard Kolman 60 0.8× 54 0.7× 7 0.2× 38 0.9× 23 0.7× 34 337
Tor Sørevik 69 0.9× 39 0.5× 40 0.9× 22 0.6× 41 1.2× 26 251
Achim Basermann 78 1.0× 35 0.5× 69 1.5× 12 0.3× 13 0.4× 48 349
Tong-Xiang Gu 171 2.3× 21 0.3× 39 0.8× 40 1.0× 15 0.5× 50 300
Carmeliza Navasca 126 1.7× 35 0.5× 17 0.4× 47 1.2× 38 1.2× 22 349
Francesco Biscani 72 0.9× 96 1.3× 8 0.2× 21 0.5× 14 0.4× 23 341
C. K. Mesztenyi 114 1.5× 30 0.4× 28 0.6× 14 0.3× 14 0.4× 12 358
Christopher Siefert 118 1.6× 11 0.1× 67 1.5× 14 0.3× 13 0.4× 25 337
Todd Plantenga 84 1.1× 99 1.3× 20 0.4× 103 2.6× 90 2.7× 19 340

Countries citing papers authored by John Fitch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Fitch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Fitch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Fitch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Fitch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Fitch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Fitch. The network helps show where John Fitch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Fitch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Fitch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Fitch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Fitch. John Fitch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026