John Fitch

42 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

John Fitch
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Hardware and Architecture 46
  • Numerical Analysis 26
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 76
  • Computational Mathematics 2
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 40
Replace Reese T. Prosser with:
Reese T. Prosser United States
S. R. Czapor Canada
Tor Sørevik Norway
G.R. Montry United States
William Saphir United States
Harry F. Jordan United States
Bernard Kolman United States
D. Parkinson United Kingdom
C. K. Mesztenyi United States
Robert Preis Germany
John Fitch relative to Reese T. Prosser United States Reese T. Prosser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Reese T. Prosser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Fitch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Fitch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Fitch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Fitch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Fitch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Fitch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Fitch. The network helps show where John Fitch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside John Fitch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Fitch Line = papers co-authored together John Fitch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198147
2 197245
3 198536
4 199528
5 197719
6 200712
7 200711
8
Computer Algebra and Parallelism
19899
9 19788
10 19747
11 19817
12 19776
13 19776
14 19915
15 19865
16 19715
17 19975
18
Measurements on the Cambridge Algebra System
19724
19
A loosely coupled parallel LISP execution system
19884
20 19894

About John Fitch

John Fitch is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Hardware and Architecture, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (9 papers), Numerical Methods and Algorithms (6 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (5 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (5 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (4 papers), Music and Audio Processing (3 papers) and Relativity and Gravitational Theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hardware and Architecture (46 citations), Numerical Analysis (26 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (76 citations), Computational Mathematics (2 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (40 citations). John Fitch has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Sudan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dávid Barton, Richard Pavelle, A. C. Norman, R. A. Lyttleton, Jean Della Dora, Martin Brain, H. Su, Marina De Vos, J.R. Banerjee and A.J. Sobey. Their work appears in journals such as Software Practice and Experience, Earth Moon and Planets, Computer Physics Communications, Scientific American and The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact