John Field

3.5k total citations
60 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

John Field is a scholar working on Education, Biomedical Engineering and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John Field has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Education, 15 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in John Field's work include Bioenergy crop production and management (14 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (14 papers) and Education Systems and Policy (8 papers). John Field is often cited by papers focused on Bioenergy crop production and management (14 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (14 papers) and Education Systems and Policy (8 papers). John Field collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. John Field's co-authors include Morgan DeFoort, Paul Tanger, Keith Paustian, Jan E. Leach, Courtney E. Jahn, Tom Schuller, Stephen Baron, Catherine Keske, M. Francesca Cotrufo and Tom L. Richard and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Environmental Science & Technology and Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

In The Last Decade

John Field

59 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Field United States 21 471 322 250 232 186 60 1.5k
Deborah O’Connell Australia 14 146 0.3× 44 0.1× 152 0.6× 117 0.5× 41 0.2× 33 1.2k
Kathleen E. Halvorsen United States 19 288 0.6× 25 0.1× 275 1.1× 116 0.5× 112 0.6× 52 1.5k
Xiaoyun Li China 24 190 0.4× 29 0.1× 145 0.6× 125 0.5× 68 0.4× 118 2.1k
Steffen Mueller United States 17 195 0.4× 28 0.1× 36 0.1× 214 0.9× 55 0.3× 29 745
Patrícia Osseweijer Netherlands 25 465 1.0× 40 0.1× 202 0.8× 48 0.2× 18 0.1× 75 2.0k
Magdalena Svanström Sweden 34 536 1.1× 608 1.9× 86 0.3× 18 0.1× 33 0.2× 129 3.5k
John R. Bartle United States 22 343 0.7× 13 0.0× 61 0.2× 190 0.8× 147 0.8× 74 1.3k
Geert Woltjer Netherlands 17 230 0.5× 54 0.2× 79 0.3× 87 0.4× 12 0.1× 44 1.3k
Natasha Gilbert United States 15 97 0.2× 80 0.2× 72 0.3× 65 0.3× 55 0.3× 113 1.8k
Michael O’Hare United States 15 1.7k 3.6× 24 0.1× 156 0.6× 555 2.4× 25 0.1× 55 3.4k

Countries citing papers authored by John Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Field. The network helps show where John Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Field. John Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wang, Weiwei, Elena Blanc‐Betes, Madhu Khanna, et al.. (2025). Land conversion to energy crops for sustainable aviation fuel production reduces greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Communications Earth & Environment. 6(1). 1 indexed citations
2.
Kern, Jordan D., et al.. (2025). Multi-objective optimization of sustainable aviation fuel production pathways in the U.S. Corn Belt. Biomass and Bioenergy. 193. 107590–107590. 1 indexed citations
3.
Lynd, Lee R., Armen R. Kemanian, Jo Smith, et al.. (2024). Soil application of high-lignin fermentation byproduct to increase the sustainability of liquid biofuel production from crop residues. Environmental Research Letters. 19(8). 83002–83002. 3 indexed citations
4.
Beal, Colin M., et al.. (2023). Evaluating the sustainability of the 2017 US biofuel industry with an integrated techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 413. 137364–137364. 10 indexed citations
5.
Masum, Farhad, et al.. (2023). Designing a GIS‐based supply chain for producing carinata‐based sustainable aviation fuel in Georgia, USA. Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining. 17(4). 786–802. 9 indexed citations
6.
Nguyễn, Trung Hiếu, John Field, Hoyoung Kwon, et al.. (2022). A multi-product landscape life-cycle assessment approach for evaluating local climate mitigation potential. Journal of Cleaner Production. 354. 131691–131691. 12 indexed citations
7.
Masum, Farhad, John Field, Daniel P. Geller, et al.. (2022). Supply chain optimization of sustainable aviation fuel from carinata in the Southeastern United States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 171. 113032–113032. 22 indexed citations
8.
George, Sheeja, Ramdeo Seepaul, Puneet Dwivedi, et al.. (2021). A regional inter‐disciplinary partnership focusing on the development of a carinata‐centered bioeconomy. GCB Bioenergy. 13(7). 1018–1029. 29 indexed citations
9.
Bonito, Gregory, Melissa A. Cregger, John Field, et al.. (2021). Frontiers and Opportunities in Bioenergy Crop Microbiome Research Networks. Phytobiomes Journal. 6(2). 118–126. 2 indexed citations
11.
Field, John, Tom L. Richard, Erica A. H. Smithwick, et al.. (2020). Robust paths to net greenhouse gas mitigation and negative emissions via advanced biofuels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117(36). 21968–21977. 128 indexed citations
12.
Field, John, Samuel G. Evans, Ernie Marx, et al.. (2018). High-resolution techno–ecological modelling of a bioenergy landscape to identify climate mitigation opportunities in cellulosic ethanol production. Nature Energy. 3(3). 211–219. 52 indexed citations
13.
Tanger, Paul, John Field, Courtney E. Jahn, Morgan DeFoort, & Jan E. Leach. (2013). Biomass for thermochemical conversion: targets and challenges. Frontiers in Plant Science. 4. 218–218. 192 indexed citations
14.
Field, John, et al.. (2012). Distributed biochar and bioenergy coproduction: a regionally specific case study of environmental benefits and economic impacts. GCB Bioenergy. 5(2). 177–191. 117 indexed citations
15.
Sparrevik, Magnus, John Field, Vegard Martinsen, Gijs D. Breedveld, & Gerard Cornelissen. (2012). Life Cycle Assessment to Evaluate the Environmental Impact of Biochar Implementation in Conservation Agriculture in Zambia. Environmental Science & Technology. 47(3). 1206–1215. 72 indexed citations
16.
Field, John. (2005). Social Capital and Lifelong Learning. Bristol University Press eBooks. 13 indexed citations
17.
Field, John. (2001). Lifelong education. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 20(1-2). 3–15. 100 indexed citations
18.
Field, John. (1998). The Silent Explosion--Living in the Learning Society.. Adults learning. 10(4). 6–8. 3 indexed citations
19.
Field, John, et al.. (1995). The funding and organization of adult continuing education research in Britain: trends and prospects. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 14(3). 247–260. 3 indexed citations
20.
Field, John. (1992). Quality Counts? Citations Analysis and Performance Measurement.. Higher education review. 24(3). 37–41. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026