John Field

59 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

John Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 232
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 52
  • Environmental Engineering 165
  • Education 322
  • Biomedical Engineering 471
Replace Geert Woltjer with:
Geert Woltjer Netherlands
Natasha Gilbert United States
Deborah O’Connell Australia
Magdalena Svanström Sweden
Barry Ness Sweden
Patrícia Osseweijer Netherlands
Gisbert Glaser Australia
Kathleen E. Halvorsen United States
Francisco J. Lozano Mexico
Suvi Huttunen Finland
John Field relative to Geert Woltjer Netherlands Geert Woltjer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Geert Woltjer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Field. The network helps show where John Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Field Line = papers co-authored together John Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013192
2 2020128
3 2012117
4 2001100
5 200094
6 201787
7 202178
8 201272
9 200057
10 201852
11 200452
12
European Dimensions: Education, Training and the European Union
199735
13 200332
14 199430
15 202129
16 201527
17 201826
18
Informal learning and social capital
200024
19 200023
20 202222

About John Field

John Field is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Education, Soil Science, Political Science and International Relations and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bioenergy crop production and management (14 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (14 papers), Education Systems and Policy (8 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (7 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (7 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (7 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (6 papers) and Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (232 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (52 citations), Environmental Engineering (165 citations), Education (322 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (471 citations). John Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Morgan DeFoort, Paul Tanger, Keith Paustian, Courtney E. Jahn, Jan E. Leach, Tom Schuller, Stephen Baron, M. Francesca Cotrufo, Catherine Keske and Tom L. Richard. Their work appears in journals such as GCB Bioenergy, International Journal of Lifelong Education, Journal of Social History, Journal of Cleaner Production and Open Learning The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026