John Fearnley

828 total citations
35 papers, 181 citations indexed

About

John Fearnley is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, John Fearnley has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 181 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 17 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 13 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in John Fearnley's work include Game Theory and Applications (16 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (11 papers) and Game Theory and Voting Systems (9 papers). John Fearnley is often cited by papers focused on Game Theory and Applications (16 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (11 papers) and Game Theory and Voting Systems (9 papers). John Fearnley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Israel. John Fearnley's co-authors include Rahul Savani, Paul W. Goldberg, Argyrios Deligkas, Marcin Jurdziński, Martin Gairing, Sven Schewe, Paul G. Spirakis, Frank Stephan, Dominik Wojtczak and Sanjay Jain and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of the ACM and SIAM Journal on Computing.

In The Last Decade

John Fearnley

31 papers receiving 174 citations

Peers

John Fearnley
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Management Science and Operations Research 83
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 78
  • Artificial Intelligence 63
  • Economics and Econometrics 59
  • Computer Networks and Communications 29
Replace Kristoffer Arnsfelt Hansen with:
Kristoffer Arnsfelt Hansen Denmark
Manfred Kerber United Kingdom
Alexis C. Kaporis Greece
Dušan Knop Czechia
Katarzyna Paluch Poland
Václav Brožek Czechia
Germán Hernández Colombia
Davide Bilò Italy
Sepp Hartung Germany
Rajiv Raman United States
Kristoffer Arnsfelt Hansen Denmark View profile →
Citations per field, relative to John Fearnley
John Fearnley · 1×
Citations per year, relative to John Fearnley
John Fearnley · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by John Fearnley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Fearnley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Fearnley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Fearnley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Fearnley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Fearnley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Fearnley. The network helps show where John Fearnley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Fearnley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Fearnley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Fearnley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Fearnley. John Fearnley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 1
4 0
5 2
6 4
7 2
8 1
9 3
10 6
11 11
12 2
13 1
14 1
15 7
16 6
17 16
18 1
19 4
20
Time and Space Results for Parity Games with Bounded Treewidth
0

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026