John F. Stone
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Soil Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Avery A. SandbergKristen M. OelschlagerJeff WilkinsonRobert W. CookRodman MorganDerek MaetzoldClare JohnsonZhong Chen
- Topics
- Irrigation Practices and Water Management (20 papers)Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (12 papers)Soil and Unsaturated Flow (12 papers)
- Cited by
- Soil ScienceOncologyOphthalmology
- Partner nations
- United StatesPolandMalaysia
In The Last Decade
John F. Stone
88 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Molecular Biology 566
- Oncology 494
- Plant Science 296
- Genetics 179
- Soil Science 179
Countries citing papers authored by John F. Stone
This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Stone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Stone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Stone. The network helps show where John F. Stone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Stone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Stone. John F. Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 37 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 116 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | Neutron gauge calibration comparison of methods | 4 |
| 15 | The ASCE neutron probe calibration study: overview | 6 |
| 16 | Error analysis of bulk density measurements for neutron moisture gauge calibration | 5 |
| 17 | Performance Factors of Neutron Moisture Probes Related to Position of Source on Detector | 2 |
| 18 | Soil Bulk Density Sampling for Neutron Gauge Calibration | 8 |
| 19 | Relationship of Soil Type and Chemicals to the Calibration of Neutron Meters | 1 |
| 20 | Neutron Physics Considerations in Moisture Probe Design | 9 |
About John F. Stone
John F. Stone is a scholar working on Soil Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Radiation, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Irrigation Practices and Water Management (20 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (12 papers) and Soil and Unsaturated Flow (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (179 citations), Oncology (494 citations) and Ophthalmology (129 citations). John F. Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Avery A. Sandberg, Kristen M. Oelschlager, Jeff Wilkinson, Robert W. Cook, Rodman Morgan, Derek Maetzold, Clare Johnson, Zhong Chen, Keith A. Delman and Rodabe N. Amaria. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Clinical Oncology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.