Stephen Lyle
Impact in
- Urology top 0.2%
- Hair Growth and Disorders
- Dermatology top 0.2%
- Cancer and Skin Lesions
Papers in
- Urology 18
- Hair Growth and Disorders 18
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 19
- Co-authors
- George CotsarelisYaping LiuNathan W. MooreDavid E. ElderMelpo Christofidou‐SolomidouAlexander J. LazarZaixin YangCecilia Roh
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (14 papers)Cancer Research (6 papers)Clinical Cancer Research (3 papers)Journal of Cutaneous Pathology (3 papers)Stem Cells and Development (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen Lyle
100 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Urology 1.1k
- Dermatology 989
- Cell Biology 920
- Oncology 1.4k
- Cancer Research 763
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Lyle
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Lyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Lyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Lyle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Lyle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Lyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Lyle. The network helps show where Stephen Lyle may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Lyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 71 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 187 | |
| 5 | Validation of a multi-marker test that predicts recurrence in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) | 2015 | 1 |
| 6 | 2015 | 116 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 70 | |
| 10 | Bloody vaginal discharge in a goat with an endometrial stromal polyp. | 2012 | 2 |
| 11 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 93 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 62 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 24 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 106 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 95 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 22 |
About Stephen Lyle
Stephen Lyle is a scholar working on Urology, Cancer Research, Dermatology, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 100 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (19 papers), Hair Growth and Disorders (18 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (11 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (10 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (9 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (7 papers), Skin and Cellular Biology Research (7 papers) and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (1.1k citations), Dermatology (989 citations), Cell Biology (920 citations), Oncology (1.4k citations) and Cancer Research (763 citations). Stephen Lyle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include George Cotsarelis, Yaping Liu, Nathan W. Moore, David E. Elder, Melpo Christofidou‐Solomidou, Alexander J. Lazar, Zaixin Yang, Cecilia Roh, Steven Albelda and Eduardo Calonje. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Research, Clinical Cancer Research, Journal of Cutaneous Pathology and Stem Cells and Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.