John F. Seccombe

11 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

John F. Seccombe
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Physiology 115
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 108
  • Immunology 92
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 80
  • Surgery 61
Replace B.F. Becker with:
B.F. Becker Germany
J.A. Avontuur Netherlands
Thomas M. Glenn United States
Emine Yılmaz Sipahi Türkiye
L.M.A. Sassen Netherlands
Albert H. Olivencia‐Yurvati United States
Iriana Colorado United States
Nunzia Carusio France
G D Buckberg United States
John S. Harrington United States
John F. Seccombe relative to B.F. Becker Germany B.F. Becker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
B.F. Becker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John F. Seccombe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Seccombe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Seccombe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Seccombe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Seccombe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Seccombe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Seccombe. The network helps show where John F. Seccombe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Seccombe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Seccombe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Seccombe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Seccombe. John F. Seccombe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
can a multidisciplinary cardiac surgery blood conservation program succeed? A single center, 6 year, 687 patient retrospective blood/blood product utilization review : Phv06
0
2 31
3 77
4
[Experimental methods in the study of endothelial function].
4
5
[Ischemia-reperfusion lesion. Physiopathologic aspects and the importance of the endothelial function].
8
6 49
7 5
8 41
9
Oxygen radical-mediated vascular injury selectively inhibits receptor-dependent release of nitric oxide from canine coronary arteries.
47
10 7
11 22
12 106

About John F. Seccombe

John F. Seccombe is a scholar working on Biophysics, Biochemistry and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (5 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (5 papers) and Electron Spin Resonance Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (33 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (108 citations) and Physiology (115 citations). John F. Seccombe has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Hartzell V. Schaff, Paul J. Pearson, Keith L. Clay, Paulo Roberto Barbosa Évora, Richard B. Johnston, G. Scott Worthen, L A Guthrie, Ajeet D. Sharma, Antoine Al-Achi and Richard Hummel. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Immunology, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026