John F. Pruski
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Plant Science
- Molecular Biology
- Food Science
- Co-authors
- Lowell E. UrbatschGisela SanchoLiliana KatinasMarı́a Cristina Tellerı́aGuy L NesomD. J. N. HindArne A. AnderbergWalter C. Holmes
- Topics
- Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (28 papers)Plant Diversity and Evolution (16 papers)Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesArgentinaSweden
In The Last Decade
John F. Pruski
39 papers receiving 302 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Cancer Research 203
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 196
- Plant Science 157
- Molecular Biology 139
- Food Science 18
Countries citing papers authored by John F. Pruski
This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Pruski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Pruski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Pruski more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Pruski
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Pruski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Pruski. The network helps show where John F. Pruski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Pruski
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Pruski. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Pruski based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Pruski. John F. Pruski is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | Resurrected species of Erigeron (Asteraceae: Astereae) from Central America | 1 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | Two new cauliflorous species of Daphnopsis (Thymelaeaceae) from French Guiana and Surinam | 3 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About John F. Pruski
John F. Pruski is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (28 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (16 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (203 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (196 citations) and Plant Science (157 citations). John F. Pruski has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Argentina and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Lowell E. Urbatsch, Gisela Sancho, Liliana Katinas, Marı́a Cristina Tellerı́a, Gisela Sancho, Guy L Nesom, D. J. N. Hind, Arne A. Anderberg, Walter C. Holmes and Carl E. Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Taxon, The Botanical Review and Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.