John F. Howes
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology top 5%
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Co-authors
- William L. DeweyLouis S. HarrisGary D. NovackDonald L. WiseRaj K. RazdanCynthia BellKathryn HartR. S. Crockett
- Topics
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers)Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
John F. Howes
76 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 677
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 522
- Molecular Biology 500
- Physiology 406
- Pharmacology 401
Countries citing papers authored by John F. Howes
This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Howes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Howes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Howes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Howes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Howes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Howes. The network helps show where John F. Howes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Howes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Howes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Howes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Howes. John F. Howes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | Comparative efficacy of loteprednol etabonate and prednisolone acetate in the conjunctival provocation test model of ocular allergy | 1 |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 57 | |
| 7 | 62 | |
| 8 | 68 | |
| 9 | 66 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 77 | |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 64 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Potential therapeutic agents derived from the cannabinoid nucleus. | 12 |
| 20 | 65 |
About John F. Howes
John F. Howes is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (346 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (677 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (193 citations). John F. Howes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include William L. Dewey, Louis S. Harris, Gary D. Novack, Donald L. Wise, Raj K. Razdan, Cynthia Bell, Kathryn Hart, R. S. Crockett, Mark B. Sherwood and Robert Laibovitz. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.