John F. Bain
- Insect Science top 1%
- Ecology top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Eckehard G. BrockerhoffMiloš Knı́žekMark O. KimberleyRobert K. JansenW. Preston ThomasPeter J. CameronF. D. BennettAndrée M. Desrochers
- Topics
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (20 papers)Forest Insect Ecology and Management (17 papers)Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (15 papers)
- Journals
- EvolutionOecologiaMolecular Ecology
- Partner nations
- CanadaNew ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
John F. Bain
57 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Insect Science 523
- Ecology 486
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 458
- Plant Science 448
- Molecular Biology 232
Countries citing papers authored by John F. Bain
This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Bain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Bain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Bain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Bain
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Bain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Bain. The network helps show where John F. Bain may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Bain
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Bain. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Bain based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Bain. John F. Bain is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | Exotic nematode found in pine trees in Melbourne, Victoria. | 6 |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 75 | |
| 16 | Taxonomy of Senecio streptanthifolius Greene | 10 |
| 17 | 62 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About John F. Bain
John F. Bain is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (20 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (17 papers) and Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (523 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (458 citations) and Ecology (486 citations). John F. Bain has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eckehard G. Brockerhoff, Miloš Knı́žek, Mark O. Kimberley, Robert K. Jansen, W. Preston Thomas, Peter J. Cameron, F. D. Bennett, Andrée M. Desrochers, Suzanne I. Warwick and Lawrence B. Flanagan. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution, Oecologia and Molecular Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.