John Edington

14 papers receiving 643 citations

Peers

John Edington
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Emergency Medicine 154
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 74
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 52
  • Neurology 87
  • Epidemiology 166
Replace Daniel I. Sack with:
Daniel I. Sack United States
Michael P Pietrzak United States
Daniela N. Vásquez Argentina
Enric Barbeta Spain
Brian Todd Wessman United States
Aileen L. Kirby United States
Al R. Jephson United States
Peter D. Ritchie Australia
Speranza Bocchino Italy
Todd A. Seigel United States
John Edington relative to Daniel I. Sack United States Daniel I. Sack's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Daniel I. Sack · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Edington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Edington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Edington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Edington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Edington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Edington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Edington. The network helps show where John Edington may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Edington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Edington Line = papers co-authored together John Edington links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2010267
2 201094
3 200789
4 200948
5 201338
6 202033
7 199731
8 196822
9 201721
10
Patients want to know about the 'cardiac blues'.
201514
11 201710
12 20237
13 20135
14 20081

About John Edington

John Edington is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (2 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (1 paper), Restraint-Related Deaths (1 paper), Foreign Body Medical Cases (1 paper), Adrenal Hormones and Disorders (1 paper) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (154 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (74 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (52 citations), Neurology (87 citations) and Epidemiology (166 citations). John Edington has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ruth Endacott, Wendy Pearl Chaboyer, David James Cooper, Kevin Masci, Vina P. Nguyen, Karen L. Smith, Mark Fitzgerald, Jeffrey Victor Rosenfeld, Peter Alistair Cameron and Paul Stewart Myles. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgery, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Annals of Emergency Medicine and British journal of surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact