John E. Sherman
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 8
- Surgery top 2%
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 6
- Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques 4
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 3
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 6
- Hepatology top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases 3
-
- Soft tissue tumor case studies 3
-
- Meningioma and schwannoma management 3
- Co-authors
- Linda E.A. KanimMarc R. NuwerEdgar G. DawsonLinda G. CarlsonRick B. DelamarterSteven L. GriffithJames W. OgilvieJames Carr
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyBelgium
In The Last Decade
John E. Sherman
32 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 740
- Surgery 1.2k
- Pharmacology 316
- Hepatology 86
- Neurology 118
Countries citing papers authored by John E. Sherman
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Sherman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Sherman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Sherman. The network helps show where John E. Sherman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Sherman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 81 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 158 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 38 | |
| 10 | Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter surveybreakdown → | 1995 | 461 |
| 11 | 1993 | 26 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 180 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 65 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 65 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 26 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 31 |
About John E. Sherman
John E. Sherman is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Transplantation, Pharmacology and Dermatology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (6 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (4 papers), Soft tissue tumor case studies (3 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (3 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (3 papers) and Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (740 citations), Surgery (1.2k citations), Pharmacology (316 citations), Hepatology (86 citations) and Neurology (118 citations). John E. Sherman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Linda E.A. Kanim, Marc R. Nuwer, Edgar G. Dawson, Linda G. Carlson, Rick B. Delamarter, Steven L. Griffith, James W. Ogilvie, James Carr, Hansen A. Yuan and J B Carr. Their work appears in journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The Spine Journal, Spine, Annals of Plastic Surgery and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.