John E. Lynch

1.4k citations
50 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 18

John E. Lynch

49 papers receiving 897 citations

Peers

John E. Lynch
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Molecular Medicine 264
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 49
  • Pharmacology 283
  • Small Animals 96
  • Microbiology 47
Replace Roy Cleeland with:
Roy Cleeland United States
E. Yourassowsky Belgium
L. B. Guze United States
Daniel Amsterdam United States
A. M. Geddes United Kingdom
L. P. Garrod United Kingdom
C Tancrède France
Melinda K. Lacy United States
Neil E. Klutman United States
Maria Teresa Mascellino Italy
John E. Lynch relative to Roy Cleeland United States Roy Cleeland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Roy Cleeland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Lynch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Lynch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Lynch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Lynch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Lynch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Lynch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Lynch. The network helps show where John E. Lynch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Lynch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Lynch Line = papers co-authored together John E. Lynch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20132
2 20116
3 201120
4 201012
5 201011
6 200924
7 200819
8 200737
9 200329
10 20014
11 19970
12 198615
13 197613
14 196933
15
Tinidazole, a new antiprotozoal agent: Effect on Trichomonas and other protozoa.
196935
16 196820
17 19673
18 196656
19
The influence of duration of therapy and type of infection on the antioxyurid activity of established agents.
19571
20 19544

About John E. Lynch

John E. Lynch is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology, Microbiology and Periodontics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (7 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (7 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (7 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (6 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (4 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (3 papers), Oral microbiology and periodontitis research (3 papers) and Muscle and Compartmental Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (264 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (49 citations), Pharmacology (283 citations), Small Animals (96 citations) and Microbiology (47 citations). John E. Lynch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include A. R. English, James A. Retsema, Wayne E. Barth, Harold L. Howes, Mark K. Hinders, Alan R. Hargens, Agnès Girard, J. A. Faiella, L. H. Conover and James W. McFarland. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Parasitology, Poultry Science and Clinical Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026