John E. Byrd

756 total citations
23 papers, 413 citations indexed

About

John E. Byrd is a scholar working on Archeology, Genetics and Anthropology. According to data from OpenAlex, John E. Byrd has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 413 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Archeology, 8 papers in Genetics and 6 papers in Anthropology. Recurrent topics in John E. Byrd's work include Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (17 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (6 papers) and Forensic and Genetic Research (6 papers). John E. Byrd is often cited by papers focused on Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (17 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (6 papers) and Forensic and Genetic Research (6 papers). John E. Byrd collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Venezuela. John E. Byrd's co-authors include Bradley J. Adams, Carl N. Stephan, Jodi M. Caple, Ellie Simpson, Pierre Guyomarc’h, Richard M. Thomas, Harold E. Trease, Brett G. Amidan, Trenton C. Pulsipher and Douglas H. Ubelaker and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Forensic Science International and Journal of Forensic Sciences.

In The Last Decade

John E. Byrd

22 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John E. Byrd United States 12 298 132 89 72 60 23 413
Bruno Dutailly France 9 335 1.1× 120 0.9× 38 0.4× 63 0.9× 47 0.8× 22 441
Sotiris K. Manolis Greece 14 633 2.1× 295 2.2× 103 1.2× 54 0.8× 49 0.8× 36 796
Efthymia Nikita Cyprus 18 707 2.4× 259 2.0× 218 2.4× 157 2.2× 51 0.8× 82 928
Martin Evison United Kingdom 12 281 0.9× 146 1.1× 39 0.4× 30 0.4× 23 0.4× 61 582
María Teresa Ferreira Portugal 15 621 2.1× 225 1.7× 49 0.6× 85 1.2× 40 0.7× 85 813
Tomohito Nagaoka Japan 15 459 1.5× 220 1.7× 189 2.1× 74 1.0× 34 0.6× 61 639
Susan Kuzminsky United States 9 167 0.6× 50 0.4× 85 1.0× 84 1.2× 47 0.8× 15 318
Joseph T. Hefner United States 13 534 1.8× 407 3.1× 48 0.5× 35 0.5× 59 1.0× 38 644
Norman J. Sauer United States 10 261 0.9× 165 1.3× 26 0.3× 26 0.4× 22 0.4× 18 415
Marco Milella Switzerland 13 421 1.4× 123 0.9× 188 2.1× 125 1.7× 72 1.2× 49 637

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Byrd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Byrd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Byrd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Byrd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Byrd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Byrd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Byrd. The network helps show where John E. Byrd may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John E. Byrd

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John E. Byrd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John E. Byrd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John E. Byrd. John E. Byrd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stephan, Carl N., et al.. (2023). Cervicothoracic junction in disaster victim identification: Idiosyncrasies and relevance of body position for advanced chest radiograph comparisons. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 69(5). 1587–1603. 1 indexed citations
2.
Byrd, John E., et al.. (2021). Infracranial radiographic comparison for human identification: A study of image quality and tissue shielding effects. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 67(3). 854–867. 4 indexed citations
3.
Byrd, John E., et al.. (2021). Infra‐cranial radiographic comparison for human identification: A study of analyst expertise. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 66(6). 2126–2137. 4 indexed citations
4.
Holliday, Trenton W., et al.. (2019). Ecogeographic patterns in fetal limb proportions. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 169(1). 93–103. 2 indexed citations
5.
Byrd, John E., et al.. (2018). Evaluation of method performance for osteometric sorting of commingled human remains. Forensic Sciences Research. 3(4). 343–349. 11 indexed citations
6.
Caple, Jodi M., John E. Byrd, & Carl N. Stephan. (2018). The utility of elliptical Fourier analysis for estimating ancestry and sex from lateral skull photographs. Forensic Science International. 289. 352–362. 15 indexed citations
7.
Caple, Jodi M., John E. Byrd, & Carl N. Stephan. (2017). Elliptical Fourier analysis: fundamentals, applications, and value for forensic anthropology. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 131(6). 1675–1690. 60 indexed citations
8.
Byrd, John E., et al.. (2017). The Power of Exclusion using Automated Osteometric Sorting: Pair‐Matching,. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 63(2). 371–380. 18 indexed citations
9.
Byrd, John E. & Bradley J. Adams. (2016). Analysis of Commingled Human Remains. 268–284. 8 indexed citations
10.
Guyomarc’h, Pierre, et al.. (2016). A Large‐Sample Test of a Semi‐Automated Clavicle Search Engine to Assist Skeletal Identification by Radiograph Comparison. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 62(1). 181–186. 10 indexed citations
11.
Thomas, Richard M., Douglas H. Ubelaker, & John E. Byrd. (2013). Tables for the Metric Evaluation of Pair‐Matching of Human Skeletal Elements. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 58(4). 952–956. 20 indexed citations
12.
Stephan, Carl N., et al.. (2013). The Identification of US POWs and MIAs from the Korean War Via the Recovery and Digitization of Deteriorated Acetate X-rays. Archiving Conference. 10(1). 210–210. 1 indexed citations
13.
Stephan, Carl N., Brett G. Amidan, Harold E. Trease, et al.. (2013). Morphometric Comparison of Clavicle Outlines from 3D Bone Scans and 2D Chest Radiographs: A Shortlisting Tool to Assist Radiographic Identification of Human Skeletons. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 59(2). 306–313. 40 indexed citations
14.
Stephan, Carl N., Ellie Simpson, & John E. Byrd. (2013). Facial Soft Tissue Depth Statistics and Enhanced Point Estimators for Craniofacial Identification: The Debut of the Shorth and the 75‐Shormax. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 58(6). 1439–1457. 32 indexed citations
15.
Mann, Robert W., et al.. (2009). Relationship of the Parietal Foramen and Complexity of the Human Sagittal Suture. International Journal of Morphology. 27(2). 13 indexed citations
16.
Adams, Bradley J. & John E. Byrd. (2008). Recovery, Analysis, and Identification of Commingled Human Remains. Humana Press eBooks. 82 indexed citations
17.
Adams, Bradley J. & John E. Byrd. (2005). Resolution of small-scale commingling: A case report from the Vietnam War. Forensic Science International. 156(1). 63–69. 37 indexed citations
18.
Byrd, John E., et al.. (1997). A Method for Measuring Relative Abundance of Fragmented Archaeological Ceramics. Journal of Field Archaeology. 24(3). 315–320. 16 indexed citations
19.
Byrd, John E.. (1997). The Analysis of Diversity in Archaeological Faunal Assemblages: Complexity and Subsistence Strategies in the Southeast during the Middle Woodland Period. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 16(1). 49–72. 14 indexed citations
20.
Byrd, John E. & Richard L. Jantz. (1994). Osteological Evidence For Distinct Social Groups At the Leavenworth Site. 203–208. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026