John E. Arbo
Impact in
- Family Practice top 10%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
-
- Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Papers in ⓘ
- Co-authors
- David Berlin (3 shared papers)Edward J. Schenck (2 shared papers)Eli J. Finkelsztein (2 shared papers)Daniel S. Jones (1 shared paper)Augustine M.K. Choi (1 shared paper)Maria Pabón (1 shared paper)C. Kevin (1 shared paper)Ilias Ι. Siempos (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Journal of Emergency Medicine (2 papers)Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (2 papers)Journal of Critical Care (1 paper)World Journal of Surgery (1 paper)Critical Ultrasound Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGreece
In The Last Decade
John E. Arbo
10 papers receiving 264 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Family Practice 27
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 55
- Epidemiology 169
- Emergency Medicine 44
- Surgery 131
Countries citing papers authored by John E. Arbo
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Arbo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Arbo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Arbo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Arbo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Arbo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Arbo. The network helps show where John E. Arbo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Arbo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 151 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 11 | Decision Making in Emergency Critical Care: An Evidence-Based Handbook, 1e | 2015 | 0 |
About John E. Arbo
John E. Arbo is a scholar working on Medical Laboratory Technology, Family Practice, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medical Services and Internal Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (8 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (2 papers), Disaster Response and Management (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (1 paper), Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper) and Hernia repair and management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (27 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (55 citations), Epidemiology (169 citations), Emergency Medicine (44 citations) and Surgery (131 citations). John E. Arbo has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include David Berlin, Edward J. Schenck, Eli J. Finkelsztein, Daniel S. Jones, Augustine M.K. Choi, Maria Pabón, C. Kevin, Ilias Ι. Siempos, Kiichi Nakahira and Christina Weltz. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, Journal of Critical Care, World Journal of Surgery and Critical Ultrasound Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.