John D. Scandling
Impact in
- Transplantation top 0.05%
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
- Nephrology top 0.5%
Papers in
-
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments 54
- Nephrology 20
- Dialysis and Renal Disease Management 9
- Co-authors
- Edward J. AlfreyDonald C. DafoeJudith A. ShizuruMaria T. MillanStéphan BusqueGabriel M. DanovitchSussan Dejbakhsh‐JonesRobert Lowsky
- Journals
- Transplantation (26 papers)Clinical Transplantation (8 papers)American Journal of Transplantation (6 papers)The Journal of Urology (4 papers)American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
John D. Scandling
101 papers receiving 3.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Transplantation 2.3k
- Nephrology 748
- Hematology 461
- Surgery 1.5k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.0k
Countries citing papers authored by John D. Scandling
This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Scandling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Scandling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Scandling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Scandling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Scandling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Scandling. The network helps show where John D. Scandling may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John D. Scandling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 33 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 39 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 33 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 52 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 31 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 116 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 229 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 29 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 69 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 30 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 99 |
About John D. Scandling
John D. Scandling is a scholar working on Transplantation, Nephrology, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Hematology, having authored 102 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (54 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (37 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (26 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (13 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (10 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (9 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (8 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (2.3k citations), Nephrology (748 citations), Hematology (461 citations), Surgery (1.5k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.0k citations). John D. Scandling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Edward J. Alfrey, Donald C. Dafoe, Judith A. Shizuru, Maria T. Millan, Stéphan Busque, Gabriel M. Danovitch, Sussan Dejbakhsh‐Jones, Robert Lowsky, Samuel Strober and Edgar G. Engleman. Their work appears in journals such as Transplantation, Clinical Transplantation, American Journal of Transplantation, The Journal of Urology and American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.