John D. Scandling

5.7k citations
102 papers · 4.0k indexed · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

John D. Scandling

101 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

John D. Scandling
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Transplantation 2.3k
  • Nephrology 748
  • Hematology 461
  • Surgery 1.5k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.0k
Replace John J. Curtis with:
John J. Curtis United States
John Jeffery Canada
Alan Wilkinson United States
James A. Schulak United States
Richard Borrows United Kingdom
Colm Magee Ireland
Bruno Watschinger Austria
Gema Fernández‐Fresnedo Spain
Ondřej Viklický Czechia
Š Vı́tko Czechia
John D. Scandling relative to John J. Curtis United States John J. Curtis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
John J. Curtis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John D. Scandling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Scandling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Scandling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Scandling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Scandling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Scandling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Scandling. The network helps show where John D. Scandling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John D. Scandling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John D. Scandling Line = papers co-authored together John D. Scandling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20235
2 20223
3 20218
4 202041
5 201824
6 201434
7 201338
8 200633
9 200612
10 200539
11 200333
12 200352
13 200231
14 2001116
15 2000229
16 199729
17 199714
18 199569
19 199530
20 199599

About John D. Scandling

John D. Scandling is a scholar working on Transplantation, Nephrology, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Hematology, having authored 102 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (54 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (37 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (26 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (13 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (10 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (9 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (8 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (2.3k citations), Nephrology (748 citations), Hematology (461 citations), Surgery (1.5k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.0k citations). John D. Scandling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Edward J. Alfrey, Donald C. Dafoe, Judith A. Shizuru, Maria T. Millan, Stéphan Busque, Gabriel M. Danovitch, Sussan Dejbakhsh‐Jones, Robert Lowsky, Samuel Strober and Edgar G. Engleman. Their work appears in journals such as Transplantation, Clinical Transplantation, American Journal of Transplantation, The Journal of Urology and American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026