John Christie
Impact in
-
- History of Science and Natural History
-
- Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Papers in
-
- History of Science and Natural History 7
-
- History and advancements in chemistry 4
- Co-authors
- Trevor J. BroxtonPeter J. DerrickGeoffrey CantorRobert OlbyDirk StemerdingPeter F. StevensM. J. S. HodgeMary P. Winsor
- Journals
- History of Science (3 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (3 papers)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (3 papers)Ambix (2 papers)History of the Human Sciences (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
John Christie
47 papers receiving 499 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- History and Philosophy of Science 109
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 101
- General Psychology 13
- Spectroscopy 148
- Filtration and Separation 14
Countries citing papers authored by John Christie
This map shows the geographic impact of John Christie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Christie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Christie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Christie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Christie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Christie. The network helps show where John Christie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Christie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 16 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 17 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 15 | The Figural and the Literal Problems of Language in the History of Science and Philosophy, 1630-1800 | 1987 | 26 |
| 16 | 1987 | 32 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 21 | |
| 18 | 1979 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1978 | 17 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 13 |
About John Christie
John Christie is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Geometry and Topology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 52 papers that have together received 574 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (9 papers), History of Science and Natural History (7 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (4 papers), Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (4 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (4 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (109 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (101 citations), General Psychology (13 citations), Spectroscopy (148 citations) and Filtration and Separation (14 citations). John Christie has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Trevor J. Broxton, Peter J. Derrick, Geoffrey Cantor, Robert Olby, Dirk Stemerding, Peter F. Stevens, M. J. S. Hodge, Mary P. Winsor, Roland P.‐T. Chung and Jan Goliński. Their work appears in journals such as History of Science, Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Ambix and History of the Human Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.