John C. Hicks

610 total citations
10 papers, 438 citations indexed

About

John C. Hicks is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Automotive Engineering and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, John C. Hicks has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 438 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Automotive Engineering and 3 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in John C. Hicks's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (5 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers). John C. Hicks is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (5 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers). John C. Hicks collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. John C. Hicks's co-authors include Kathleen A. Turano, Hao Lei, Ralph Buehler, Francesca C. Fortenbaugh, Shirin E. Hassan, Andreï Popa, Sidhartha Chaudhury and Raghu R. Chivukula and has published in prestigious journals such as Experimental Brain Research, Vision Research and Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

John C. Hicks

10 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John C. Hicks United States	8	153	152	124	77	61	10	438
Richard L. Welsh United Kingdom	6	33 0.2×	68 0.4×	190 1.5×	20 0.3×	63 1.0×	12	388
David Guth United States	13	83 0.5×	257 1.7×	376 3.0×	58 0.8×	71 1.2×	22	692
Katsuya Matsunaga Japan	8	31 0.2×	55 0.4×	43 0.3×	13 0.2×	44 0.7×	38	296
Billie Louise Bentzen United States	16	126 0.8×	144 0.9×	365 2.9×	91 1.2×	77 1.3×	66	693
Vaughan W. Inman United States	13	59 0.4×	90 0.6×	149 1.2×	53 0.7×	66 1.1×	45	501
Delphine Bernardin France	9	19 0.1×	46 0.3×	119 1.0×	6 0.1×	30 0.5×	21	275
Tania Dükic Sweden	12	80 0.5×	60 0.4×	74 0.6×	11 0.1×	51 0.8×	37	493
Stacy A. Balk United States	9	56 0.4×	36 0.2×	41 0.3×	14 0.2×	66 1.1×	32	309
Lisbeth Harms Denmark	10	72 0.5×	65 0.4×	143 1.2×	18 0.2×	20 0.3×	22	446
Naohide Yamamoto Australia	10	37 0.2×	150 1.0×	170 1.4×	4 0.1×	27 0.4×	31	323

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Hicks

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Hicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Hicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Hicks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Hicks

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Hicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Hicks. The network helps show where John C. Hicks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John C. Hicks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John C. Hicks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John C. Hicks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John C. Hicks. John C. Hicks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Hicks, John C., et al.. (2019). Pedestrians and E-Scooters: An Initial Look at E-Scooter Parking and Perceptions by Riders and Non-Riders. Sustainability. 11(20). 5591–5591. 189 indexed citations

Fortenbaugh, Francesca C., John C. Hicks, & Kathleen A. Turano. (2008). The Effect of Peripheral Visual Field Loss on Representations of Space: Evidence for Distortion and Adaptation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(6). 2765–2765. 27 indexed citations

Popa, Andreï, et al.. (2008). Case-Based Reasoning Approach for Well Failure Diagnostics and Planning. 21 indexed citations

Fortenbaugh, Francesca C., John C. Hicks, Hao Lei, & Kathleen A. Turano. (2007). Losing sight of the bigger picture: Peripheral field loss compresses representations of space. Vision Research. 47(19). 2506–2520. 31 indexed citations

Fortenbaugh, Francesca C., John C. Hicks, Hao Lei, & Kathleen A. Turano. (2007). A technique for simulating visual field losses in virtual environments to study human navigation. Behavior Research Methods. 39(3). 552–560. 5 indexed citations

Hassan, Shirin E., John C. Hicks, Hao Lei, & Kathleen A. Turano. (2007). What is the minimum field of view required for efficient navigation?. Vision Research. 47(16). 2115–2123. 52 indexed citations

Fortenbaugh, Francesca C., Sidhartha Chaudhury, John C. Hicks, Hao Lei, & Kathleen A. Turano. (2007). Gender differences in cue preference during path integration in virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception. 4(1). 6–6. 6 indexed citations

Fortenbaugh, Francesca C., John C. Hicks, Hao Lei, & Kathleen A. Turano. (2006). High-speed navigators: Using more than what meets the eye. Journal of Vision. 6(5). 3–3. 8 indexed citations

Turano, Kathleen A., et al.. (2005). Optic-flow and egocentric-direction strategies in walking: Central vs peripheral visual field. Vision Research. 45(25-26). 3117–3132. 87 indexed citations

10.

Chaudhury, Sidhartha, et al.. (2004). Visual illusion in virtual world alters women?s target-directed walking. Experimental Brain Research. 159(3). 360–369. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact