John C. Frenzel
- Surgery
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Economics and Econometrics
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Spencer KeeThomas W. FeeleyJoseph RuizBernhard RiedelJoe EnsorHenry M. KuererKelly K. HuntJudy C. Boughey
- Topics
- Anesthesia and Pain Management (7 papers)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers)Nausea and vomiting management (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*PhysicsAnesthesiology
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyCzechia
In The Last Decade
John C. Frenzel
20 papers receiving 307 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Surgery 184
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 79
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 78
- Economics and Econometrics 44
- General Health Professions 41
Countries citing papers authored by John C. Frenzel
This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Frenzel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Frenzel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Frenzel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Frenzel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Frenzel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Frenzel. The network helps show where John C. Frenzel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John C. Frenzel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John C. Frenzel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John C. Frenzel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John C. Frenzel. John C. Frenzel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 58 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 58 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About John C. Frenzel
John C. Frenzel is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Health Information Management and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (7 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers) and Nausea and vomiting management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (79 citations), Health Informatics (8 citations) and Surgery (184 citations). John C. Frenzel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Spencer Kee, Thomas W. Feeley, Joseph Ruiz, Bernhard Riedel, Joe Ensor, Henry M. Kuerer, Kelly K. Hunt, Judy C. Boughey, Anthony Lucci and Frederick C. Ames. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Anesthesiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.