John C. Elkas
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 9
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments 4
-
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 11
- Co-authors
- G. Scott RoseMichael A. BidusMichael McHaleLouis A. DaintyAlicia ArmstrongThomas C. KrivakAlan H. DeCherneyErin I. Lewis
- Journals
- Gynecologic Oncology (12 papers)Obstetrics and Gynecology (7 papers)International Journal of Gynecological Cancer (5 papers)Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology (3 papers)Cancer (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
John C. Elkas
40 papers receiving 598 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Reproductive Medicine 226
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 202
- Epidemiology 192
- Oncology 146
- Surgery 224
Countries citing papers authored by John C. Elkas
This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Elkas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Elkas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Elkas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Elkas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Elkas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Elkas. The network helps show where John C. Elkas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Elkas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 69 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 3 | Metastatic leiomyosarcoma diagnosed after uterine artery embolization. | 2009 | 7 |
| 4 | 2007 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 45 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 42 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 35 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 56 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 30 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 9 |
About John C. Elkas
John C. Elkas is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology and Urology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (12 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (11 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (9 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (4 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (4 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (4 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (226 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (202 citations), Epidemiology (192 citations), Oncology (146 citations) and Surgery (224 citations). John C. Elkas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include G. Scott Rose, Michael A. Bidus, Michael McHale, Louis A. Dainty, Alicia Armstrong, Thomas C. Krivak, Alan H. DeCherney, Erin I. Lewis, Aradhana M. Venkatesan and Rebecca J. Chason. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.