John Beauvais

24 papers receiving 926 citations

Peers

John Beauvais
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Applied Psychology 212
  • Research and Theory 26
  • Family Practice 57
  • General Decision Sciences 44
  • Literature and Literary Theory 96
Replace David B. Portnoy with:
David B. Portnoy United States
Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis United States
Andrea Levy United States
Renee E. Magnan United States
Rosemarie A. Martin United States
Mollie A. Ruben United States
W. Dean Klinkenberg United States
Bruce W. Carlson United States
Michael Hoerger United States
Lisa Townsend United States
John Beauvais relative to David B. Portnoy United States David B. Portnoy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
David B. Portnoy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Beauvais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Beauvais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Beauvais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Beauvais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Beauvais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Beauvais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Beauvais. The network helps show where John Beauvais may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Beauvais, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Beauvais Line = papers co-authored together John Beauvais links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995275
2 2000187
3 2013182
4 199558
5 200451
6 200347
7 200938
8 201923
9 201919
10 200519
11 199116
12 201915
13 201412
14 201910
15 20176
16 20045
17 20195
18 20223
19 20193
20 20222

About John Beauvais

John Beauvais is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 24 papers that have together received 980 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (5 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers) and HIV Research and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (212 citations), Research and Theory (26 citations), Family Practice (57 citations), General Decision Sciences (44 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (96 citations). John Beauvais has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Salovey, Sue Greener, Anne Moyer, Audrey Marie Beauvais, Susan DeNisco, Julie G. Stewart, Alexander J. Rothman, Elissa S. Epel, Marc I. Rosen and Sara Banks. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Psychology and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact