John A. Gentry
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Strategy and Management
- Control and Systems Engineering
- Information Systems
- Co-authors
- David E. SpencerCaroline S. HillRobert MalcolmMinhua WangRuta GuptaXulei LuParomita RoyBrendan Conn
- Topics
- Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (27 papers)Military History and Strategy (9 papers)International Law and Human Rights (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Political Science and International RelationsStrategy and ManagementSociology and Political Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanAustralia
In The Last Decade
John A. Gentry
38 papers receiving 180 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Political Science and International Relations 155
- Sociology and Political Science 69
- Strategy and Management 24
- Control and Systems Engineering 15
- Information Systems 9
Countries citing papers authored by John A. Gentry
This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Gentry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Gentry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Gentry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Gentry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Gentry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Gentry. The network helps show where John A. Gentry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John A. Gentry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John A. Gentry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John A. Gentry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John A. Gentry. John A. Gentry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | Complex Civil-Military Operations: A U. S. Military-Centric Perspective | 0 |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About John A. Gentry
John A. Gentry is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Museology and Periodontics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 219 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (27 papers), Military History and Strategy (9 papers) and International Law and Human Rights (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (155 citations), Strategy and Management (24 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (69 citations). John A. Gentry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David E. Spencer, Caroline S. Hill, Robert Malcolm, Minhua Wang, Ruta Gupta, Xulei Lu, Paromita Roy, Brendan Conn, Scott Doyle and Margaret Brandwein‐Weber. Their work appears in journals such as Political Science Quarterly, Annals of Clinical Psychiatry and Security Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.