Johannes Oetsch

462 citations
22 papers · 89 indexed · h-index 6

Johannes Oetsch

21 papers receiving 83 citations

Peers

Johannes Oetsch
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Software 24
  • Artificial Intelligence 63
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 15
  • Hardware and Architecture 5
  • Health Informatics 1
Replace Jörg Pührer with:
Jörg Pührer Austria
Liana Hadarean United States
Thomas Ferrère Austria
Daniel Kühlwein Germany
Mate Soos Singapore
François Bobot France
Rachid Echahed France
Thomas Gibson−Robinson United Kingdom
Gabriël Konat Netherlands
Joe Hurd United Kingdom
Johannes Oetsch relative to Jörg Pührer Austria Jörg Pührer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jörg Pührer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johannes Oetsch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johannes Oetsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johannes Oetsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johannes Oetsch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johannes Oetsch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johannes Oetsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johannes Oetsch. The network helps show where Johannes Oetsch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Johannes Oetsch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johannes Oetsch Line = papers co-authored together Johannes Oetsch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20230
3 20233
4 20227
5 20221
6 20222
7 20213
8 20201
9
Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management: 19th International Conference, INAP 2011, and 25th Workshop on Logic Programming
20131
10 20133
11 20138
12 201210
13
On the small-scope hypothesis for testing answer-set programs
20125
14 20125
15 201113
16 20107
17 20102
18
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored: relativised uniform equivalence with answer-set projection
20079
19
A Tool for Advanced Correspondence Checking in Answer-Set Programming: Preliminary Experimental Results.
20061
20 20064

About Johannes Oetsch

Johannes Oetsch is a scholar working on Software, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 89 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (19 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (12 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (10 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (5 papers), Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (4 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (3 papers), Multimodal Machine Learning Applications (2 papers) and Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (24 citations), Artificial Intelligence (63 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (15 citations). Johannes Oetsch has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Japan and India. Frequent co-authors include Hans Tompits, Jörg Pührer, Stefan Woltran, Katsumi Inoue, Cemal Yılmaz, Thomas Eiter, Esra Erdem, Martina Seidl, Salvador Abreu and Marina De Vos. Their work appears in journals such as Artificial Intelligence, Lecture notes in computer science and Journal of Cardiac Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026