Johannes Feest
- Sociology and Political Science
- Law top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Clinical Psychology
- Topics
- Criminal Law and Policy (12 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers)German Security and Defense Policies (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaLaw & Society ReviewThe British Journal of Criminology
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Johannes Feest
19 papers receiving 136 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Sociology and Political Science 85
- Law 61
- Political Science and International Relations 51
- Strategy and Management 27
- Clinical Psychology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Johannes Feest
This map shows the geographic impact of Johannes Feest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johannes Feest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johannes Feest more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Johannes Feest
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johannes Feest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johannes Feest. The network helps show where Johannes Feest may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johannes Feest
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johannes Feest. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johannes Feest based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Johannes Feest. Johannes Feest is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | Abolitionism. Some Answers to Frequently Asked Questions | 1 |
| 4 | StVollzG : Kommentar zum Strafvollzugsgesetz (AK-StVollzG) | 2 |
| 5 | Abolitionismus. Einige Antworten auf oft gestellte Fragen = Abolitionism. Some Answers to Frequently Asqued Questions | 1 |
| 6 | Adapting legal cultures | 95 |
| 7 | Kommentar zum Strafvollzugsgesetz (AK-StVollzG) | 1 |
| 8 | Globalization and legal cultures : Oñati Summer Course 1997 | 2 |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Kommentar zum Strafvollzugsgesetz | 4 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Die Definitionsmacht der Polizei : Strategien der Strafverfolgung und soziale Selektion | 20 |
| 17 | Die Polizei : soziologische Studien und Forschungsberichte | 10 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Selektive Strafverfolgung durch die Polizei | 2 |
| 20 | 17 |
About Johannes Feest
Johannes Feest is a scholar working on Law, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 20 papers that have together received 176 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Law and Policy (12 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers) and German Security and Defense Policies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (61 citations), Political Science and International Relations (51 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (85 citations). Johannes Feest has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Nelken, Erhard Blankenburg and Rüdiger Lautmann. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Law & Society Review and The British Journal of Criminology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.