524 total citations 20 papers, 176 citations indexed
About
Johannes Feest is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Law.
According to data from OpenAlex, Johannes Feest has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 176 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 4 papers in Law. Recurrent topics in Johannes Feest's work include Criminal Law and Policy (12 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers) and German Security and Defense Policies (2 papers). Johannes Feest is often cited by papers focused on Criminal Law and Policy (12 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers) and German Security and Defense Policies (2 papers). Johannes Feest collaborates with scholars based in Germany. Johannes Feest's co-authors include David Nelken, Erhard Blankenburg and Rüdiger Lautmann and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Law & Society Review and The British Journal of Criminology.
In The Last Decade
Johannes Feest
19 papers
receiving
136 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Johannes Feest
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Johannes Feest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johannes Feest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johannes Feest more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johannes Feest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johannes Feest. The network helps show where Johannes Feest may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johannes Feest
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johannes Feest.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johannes Feest based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Johannes Feest. Johannes Feest is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Feest, Johannes. (2015). Abolitionism. Some Answers to Frequently Asked Questions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(2). 141–152.1 indexed citations
4.
Feest, Johannes, et al.. (2012). StVollzG : Kommentar zum Strafvollzugsgesetz (AK-StVollzG).2 indexed citations
5.
Feest, Johannes, et al.. (2008). Abolitionismus. Einige Antworten auf oft gestellte Fragen = Abolitionism. Some Answers to Frequently Asqued Questions. Kriminologisches Journal. 40(1). 6–20.1 indexed citations
6.
Nelken, David & Johannes Feest. (2001). Adapting legal cultures. Hart Publishing eBooks. 1–389.95 indexed citations
7.
Feest, Johannes, et al.. (2000). Kommentar zum Strafvollzugsgesetz (AK-StVollzG). Luchterhand eBooks.1 indexed citations
8.
Feest, Johannes. (1999). Globalization and legal cultures : Oñati Summer Course 1997. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).2 indexed citations
Feest, Johannes & Erhard Blankenburg. (1972). Die Definitionsmacht der Polizei : Strategien der Strafverfolgung und soziale Selektion.20 indexed citations
17.
Feest, Johannes & Rüdiger Lautmann. (1971). Die Polizei : soziologische Studien und Forschungsberichte. Medical Entomology and Zoology.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.