Johan van Nes
Impact in
- Neurology top 1%
- Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Papers in
- Neurology 12
- Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments 12
-
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism 5
- Co-authors
- Jacqueline Deschamps (3 shared papers)Jan Köster (4 shared papers)Rogier Versteeg (4 shared papers)Peter van Sluis (3 shared papers)Wim de Graaff (2 shared papers)Felix Beck (2 shared papers)Marloes E.C. Broekmans (3 shared papers)Linda J. Valentijn (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nature Communications (3 papers)Nature Genetics (2 papers)Development (2 papers)Nature Cancer (1 paper)Science Advances (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyBelgium
In The Last Decade
Johan van Nes
16 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Johan van Nes's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Neurology 1.3k
- Cancer Research 750
- Molecular Biology 1.7k
- Genetics 405
- Oncology 341
Countries citing papers authored by Johan van Nes
This map shows the geographic impact of Johan van Nes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan van Nes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan van Nes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Johan van Nes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan van Nes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan van Nes. The network helps show where Johan van Nes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johan van Nes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sequencing of neuroblastoma identifies chromothripsis and defects in neuritogenesis genes Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 728 |
| 2 | Neuroblastoma is composed of two super-enhancer-associated differentiation states Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 400 |
| 3 | 2012 | 324 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 301 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 206 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 195 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 117 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 108 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 99 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 79 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 26 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 4 |
About Johan van Nes
Johan van Nes is a scholar working on Neurology, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Dermatology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (12 papers), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (6 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (5 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (2 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (2 papers) and Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (1.3k citations), Cancer Research (750 citations), Molecular Biology (1.7k citations), Genetics (405 citations) and Oncology (341 citations). Johan van Nes has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jacqueline Deschamps, Jan Köster, Rogier Versteeg, Peter van Sluis, Wim de Graaff, Felix Beck, Marloes E.C. Broekmans, Linda J. Valentijn, Franciska Haneveld and Jan J. Molenaar. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Nature Genetics, Development, Nature Cancer and Science Advances.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.