Johan Philip

923 citations
29 papers · 648 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Johan Philip

26 papers receiving 585 citations

Peers

Johan Philip
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Numerical Analysis 140
  • Biophysics 146
  • Instrumentation 46
  • Structural Biology 13
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 139
Replace Gerald A. Shultz with:
Gerald A. Shultz United States
Valeria Ruggiero Italy
I.O. Bohachevsky United States
Zhimin Peng China
Wen‐Xiang Zhu China
Peter Frolkovič Slovakia
Marco Prato Italy
Myron L. Stein United States
Elisabeth Rouy France
Francine Catté France
Johan Philip relative to Gerald A. Shultz United States Gerald A. Shultz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.2×
Gerald A. Shultz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Philip

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Philip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Philip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Philip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Philip

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Philip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Philip. The network helps show where Johan Philip may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Johan Philip, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Philip Line = papers co-authored together Johan Philip links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1972186
2 2003113
3 197487
4 199653
5 200438
6 199134
7 199427
8 200222
9 199912
10 200410
11 19928
12 19637
13 19777
14 19796
15 19886
16 19725
17 19875
18
The Area of a Random Convex Polygon
20044
19 19853
20 19733

About Johan Philip

Johan Philip is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Applied Mathematics, Biophysics, Biomedical Engineering and Numerical Analysis, having authored 29 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (5 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (4 papers), Image and Signal Denoising Methods (4 papers), Point processes and geometric inequalities (3 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (3 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (2 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (2 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (140 citations), Biophysics (146 citations), Instrumentation (46 citations), Structural Biology (13 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (139 citations). Johan Philip has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kjell Carlsson, J. H. Knight, Karin Mossberg, J. P. Sprengers, C. A. de Lange, W. Ubachs, N. Åslund, E. Reinhold, P. Cacciani and Ove Söderström. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematical Programming, Mathematics of Computation, Inverse Problems, Probability Theory and Related Fields and IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact