Joey Braspenning
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Computational Mechanics
- Co-authors
- Joop SchayeMatthieu SchallerRoi KugelJohn HellyWillem ElbersJaime SalcidoBert VandenbrouckeCarlos S. Frenk
- Topics
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (8 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Joey Braspenning
12 papers receiving 237 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 223
- Instrumentation 91
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 83
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 29
- Computational Mechanics 22
Countries citing papers authored by Joey Braspenning
This map shows the geographic impact of Joey Braspenning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joey Braspenning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joey Braspenning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joey Braspenning
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joey Braspenning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joey Braspenning. The network helps show where Joey Braspenning may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joey Braspenning
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joey Braspenning. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joey Braspenning based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joey Braspenning. Joey Braspenning is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 49 | |
| 12 | The FLAMINGO project: cosmological hydrodynamical simulations for large-scale structure and galaxy cluster surveysbreakdown → | 134 |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 5 |
About Joey Braspenning
Joey Braspenning is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (8 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (91 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (223 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (83 citations). Joey Braspenning has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joop Schaye, Matthieu Schaller, Roi Kugel, John Helly, Willem Elbers, Jaime Salcido, Bert Vandenbroucke, Carlos S. Frenk, Marcel P. van Daalen and Ian G. McCarthy. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.