Joey Braspenning

472 total citations · 1 hit paper
14 papers, 276 citations indexed

About

Joey Braspenning is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Joey Braspenning has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 276 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 6 papers in Instrumentation and 3 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in Joey Braspenning's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (8 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (4 papers). Joey Braspenning is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (8 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (4 papers). Joey Braspenning collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Joey Braspenning's co-authors include Joop Schaye, Matthieu Schaller, Roi Kugel, John Helly, Willem Elbers, Carlos S. Frenk, Jaime Salcido, Ian G. McCarthy, Juliana Kwan and Marcel P. van Daalen and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

Joey Braspenning

12 papers receiving 237 citations

Hit Papers

The FLAMINGO project: cosmological hydrodynamical simulat... 2023 2026 2024 2025 2023 40 80 120

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joey Braspenning Netherlands 7 223 91 83 29 22 14 276
Roi Kugel Netherlands 9 293 1.3× 126 1.4× 108 1.3× 31 1.1× 28 1.3× 22 360
Evgenii Chaikin Netherlands 9 266 1.2× 115 1.3× 77 0.9× 29 1.0× 23 1.0× 15 324
Filip Huško United Kingdom 8 253 1.1× 107 1.2× 78 0.9× 25 0.9× 19 0.9× 10 300
Jaime Salcido United Kingdom 11 361 1.6× 117 1.3× 144 1.7× 34 1.2× 22 1.0× 21 423
Folkert S J Nobels Netherlands 10 317 1.4× 142 1.6× 99 1.2× 35 1.2× 25 1.1× 12 381
Sylvia Ploeckinger Netherlands 10 317 1.4× 145 1.6× 71 0.9× 20 0.7× 19 0.9× 18 350
Oliver Zier Germany 7 314 1.4× 82 0.9× 89 1.1× 19 0.7× 23 1.0× 25 379
Morag I. Scrimgeour Australia 6 292 1.3× 91 1.0× 83 1.0× 14 0.5× 8 0.4× 8 312
Cristiano G. Sabiu South Korea 12 307 1.4× 76 0.8× 100 1.2× 22 0.8× 11 0.5× 24 330
Fulvio Ferlito United Kingdom 11 370 1.7× 170 1.9× 131 1.6× 19 0.7× 20 0.9× 14 411

Countries citing papers authored by Joey Braspenning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joey Braspenning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joey Braspenning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joey Braspenning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joey Braspenning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joey Braspenning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joey Braspenning. The network helps show where Joey Braspenning may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joey Braspenning

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joey Braspenning. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joey Braspenning based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joey Braspenning. Joey Braspenning is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Elbers, Willem, Carlos S. Frenk, Adrian Jenkins, et al.. (2025). The FLAMINGO project: the coupling between baryonic feedback and cosmology in light of the S8 tension. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 537(2). 2160–2178. 10 indexed citations
2.
Evrard, A. E., Arya Farahi, Annalisa Pillepich, et al.. (2025). Mass proxy quality of massive halo properties in the illustrisTNG and flamingo simulations: I. Hot gas. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 544(1). 67–94.
3.
Kay, Scott T., Joop Schaye, Roi Kugel, et al.. (2024). Inferring the dark matter splashback radius from cluster gas and observable profiles in the FLAMINGO simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 529(3). 2017–2031. 9 indexed citations
4.
Upadhye, Amol, Juliana Kwan, Ian G. McCarthy, et al.. (2024). Non-linear CMB lensing with neutrinos and baryons: FLAMINGO simulations versus fast approximations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 529(2). 1862–1876. 3 indexed citations
5.
Braspenning, Joey, Joop Schaye, Matthieu Schaller, et al.. (2024). The FLAMINGO project: galaxy clusters in comparison to X-ray observations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 533(3). 2656–2676. 12 indexed citations
6.
Forrest, Ben, Michael C. Cooper, Adam Muzzin, et al.. (2024). MAGAZ3NE: Massive, Extremely Dusty Galaxies at z ∼ 2 Lead to Photometric Overestimation of Number Densities of the Most Massive Galaxies at 3 < z < 4*. The Astrophysical Journal. 977(1). 51–51. 3 indexed citations
7.
Kugel, Roi, Joop Schaye, Matthieu Schaller, et al.. (2024). The FLAMINGO project: a comparison of galaxy cluster samples selected on mass, X-ray luminosity, Compton-Y parameter, or galaxy richness. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 534(3). 2378–2396. 4 indexed citations
8.
Schaller, Matthieu, Joop Schaye, Henk Hoekstra, et al.. (2024). The FLAMINGO project: baryonic impact on weak gravitational lensing convergence peak counts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 529(3). 2309–2326. 9 indexed citations
9.
Kay, Scott T., Joey Braspenning, Jens Chluba, et al.. (2024). Relativistic SZ temperatures and hydrostatic mass bias for massive clusters in the FLAMINGO simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 534(1). 251–270. 6 indexed citations
10.
Braspenning, Joey, Joop Schaye, Matthieu Schaller, Roi Kugel, & Scott T. Kay. (2024). Hydrostatic mass bias for galaxy groups and clusters in the FLAMINGO simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 536(4). 3784–3802. 3 indexed citations
11.
Schaye, Joop, Roi Kugel, Matthieu Schaller, et al.. (2023). The FLAMINGO project: cosmological hydrodynamical simulations for large-scale structure and galaxy cluster surveys. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 526(4). 4978–5020. 134 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
McCarthy, Ian G., Jaime Salcido, Joop Schaye, et al.. (2023). The FLAMINGO project: revisiting the S8 tension and the role of baryonic physics. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 526(4). 5494–5519. 29 indexed citations
13.
Kugel, Roi, Joop Schaye, Matthieu Schaller, et al.. (2023). FLAMINGO: calibrating large cosmological hydrodynamical simulations with machine learning. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 526(4). 6103–6127. 49 indexed citations
14.
Braspenning, Joey, Joop Schaye, Josh Borrow, & Matthieu Schaller. (2023). Sensitivity of non-radiative cloud–wind interactions to the hydrodynamic solver. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 523(1). 1280–1295. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026